Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section European section International section Latin American section North American section
home
login/register
current articles
contribute
information for authors
status/user profile
links/forums
about us

Original Research

A framework for developing rural academic general practices: a qualitative case study in rural Victoria

Submitted: 26 March 2014
Revised: 6 August 2014
Accepted: 6 November 2014
Published: 29 May 2015

Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)

Author(s) : Brown JB, Morrison T, Bryant M, Kassell L, Nestel D.

James BrownDebra Nestel

Citation: Brown JB, Morrison T, Bryant M, Kassell L, Nestel D.  A framework for developing rural academic general practices: a qualitative case study in rural Victoria. Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2015; 15: 3072. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=3072 (Accessed 18 October 2017)

ABSTRACT

Introduction:  There is increasing pressure for Australian rural general practices to engage in educational delivery as a means of addressing workforce issues and accommodating substantial increases in learners. For practices that have now developed a strong focus on education, there is the challenge to complement this by engaging in research activity. This study develops a rural academic general practice framework to assist rural practices in developing both comprehensive educational activity and a strong research focus thus moving towards functioning as mature academic units.
Methods:  A case study research design was used with the unit of analysis at the level of the rural general practice. Purposively sampled practices were recruited and individual interviews conducted with staff (supervisors, practice managers, nurses), learners (medical students, interns and registrars) and patients. Three practices hosted ‘multi-level learners’, two practices hosted one learner group and one had no learners. Forty-four individual interviews were conducted with staff, learners and patients. Audio recordings were transcribed for thematic analysis. After initial inductive coding, deductive analysis was undertaken with reference to recent literature and the expertise of the research team resulting in the rural academic general practice framework.
Results:  Three key themes emerged with embedded subthemes. For the first theme, organisational considerations, subthemes were values/vision/culture, patient population and clinical services, staffing, physical infrastructure/equipment, funding streams and governance. For the second theme, educational considerations, subthemes were processes, clinical supervision, educational networks and learner presence. Third, for research considerations, there were the subthemes of attitude to research and research activity. The framework maps the development of a rural academic practice across these themes in four progressive stages: beginning, emerging, consolidating and established.
Conclusions:  The data enabled a framework to be constructed to map rural general practice activity with respect to activity characteristic of an academic general practice. The framework offers guidance to practices seeking to transition towards becoming a mature academic practice. The framework also offers guidance to educational institutions and funding bodies to support the development of academic activity in rural general practices. The strengths and limitations of the study design are outlined.

Key words: academic, education, general practice, primary care, research, rural pipeline, teaching, workforce.

This abstract has been viewed 3125 times since 29-May-2015.

   
 

   CONTACT US | COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER | ADMIN ONLY