Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section European section International section Latin American section North American section
home
login/register
current articles
contribute
information for authors
status/user profile
links/forums
about us

Review Article

Evaluating Australian Indigenous community health promotion initiatives: a selective review

Submitted: 26 February 2007
Revised: 3 May 2007
Published: 5 June 2007

Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)

Author(s) : Mikhailovich K, Morrison P, Arabena K.

Katja MikhailovichPaul MorrisonKerry Arabena

Citation: Mikhailovich K, Morrison P, Arabena K.  Evaluating Australian Indigenous community health promotion initiatives: a selective review. Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2007; 7: 746. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=746 (Accessed 19 October 2017)

ABSTRACT

Effective health promotion interventions are critical to addressing the health needs of Indigenous people. We reviewed published and unpublished evaluation reports between 2000 and 2005 to identify practice issues pertinent to evaluators of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health promotion initiatives. While the review of the literature was not systematic it was sufficiently comprehensive to provide a snapshot of evaluation practice currently in place within the Australian context. We found that published evaluation literature infrequently referred to the utilisation of guidelines for ethical research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The implications of this are that the importance and relevance of the guidelines for evaluative research are not being widely promoted or disseminated to evaluation practitioners and the role of the guidelines for improving evaluation practice remain unclear. While many innovative health promotion programs appear to have been highly regarded and well received by communities, the evaluation studies were not always able to report conclusively on the impact and health outcomes of these interventions or programs. This was due mainly to limitations in evaluation design that in some cases were insufficiently robust to measure the complex and multifaceted interventions described. To enhance rigour, evaluators of community health promotion initiatives could utilise mixed method approaches overtly informed by appropriate ethical guidelines, together with a broader range of qualitative methods aided by critical appraisal tools to assist in the design of evaluation studies.

Key words: evaluation, health promotion, Indigenous, ethical guidelines, evaluation design.

This abstract has been viewed 6741 times since 5-Jun-2007.

   
 

   CONTACT US | COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER | ADMIN ONLY