Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section Australasian section European section Latin American section North American section
current articles

information for authors
status/user profile
about us

Short Communication

Secondhand smoke exposure in Alaskan households with children

Submitted: 2 July 2010
Revised: 9 October 2010
Published: 7 December 2010

Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)

Author(s) : Dent CW, Maher JE, Pizacani BA, Dowler DW, Rohde K, Peterson E.

Citation: Dent CW, Maher JE, Pizacani BA, Dowler DW, Rohde K, Peterson E.  Secondhand smoke exposure in Alaskan households with children. Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2010; 10: 1564. Available: (Accessed 18 October 2017)


Introduction: Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure causes premature death and disease in children and non-smoking adults; the home is the primary source of SHS exposure. The aim of this study was to assess variance in the prevalence of children’s SHS exposure in Alaskan households with an adult smoker according to rurality, race/ethnicity, income and education, household age composition, marital status, amount smoked each day, and beliefs in SHS health consequences.
Method:  Telephone interviews were conducted between 2004 and 2007 on a population-based random sample of 1119 Alaskan adult smokers with children living in the household.
Results:  Respondents living with children over 5 years of age reported a significantly (p <0.05) higher prevalence of home SHS exposure, compared with those living with younger children. Respondents 40 years and older reported significantly more exposure than others. Alaska Native smokers reported significantly lower SHS exposure in their homes than those of other races, as did those living in very rural areas. Respondents’ heavier smoking was significantly associated with more SHS exposure. The sub-population of adults living without other adults was approximately 1.5 times more likely to report SHS exposure than those living with other adults. As expected, having a no-smoking rule in the home greatly lowered the risk of SHS exposure in the home.
Conclusions:  Although most smokers with children believed that SHS is harmful, some need to convert those beliefs into actions. The results from this study suggest that those with school-aged children, and moderate to heavy smokers should be targeted for intervention, given their high prevalence of home SHS exposure. Future work should examine reasons for low exposure levels among Alaska Native people to inform programmatic efforts in other communities.

Key words:  Alaska, child, passive smoking, risk factors, USA.

This abstract has been viewed 3623 times since 7-Dec-2010.