Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section Australasian section European section Latin American section North American section
current articles

information for authors
status/user profile
about us

Project Report

The Queensland Health Rural Generalist Pathway: providing a medical workforce for the bush

Submitted: 10 August 2012
Revised: 20 December 2012
Accepted: 13 March 2013
Published: 24 May 2013

Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)

Author(s) : Sen Gupta TK, Manahan DL, Lennox DR, Taylor NL.

Tarun Sen GuptaDaniel ManahanDenis Lennox

Citation: Sen Gupta TK, Manahan DL, Lennox DR, Taylor NL.  The Queensland Health Rural Generalist Pathway: providing a medical workforce for the bush. Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2013; 13: 2319. Available: (Accessed 20 October 2017)


Click here to hear an intoduction by the authors

Introduction:  Queensland Health’s Rural Generalist Pathway is a supported career pathway for junior doctors to train in rural and remote medicine. The pathway joins evidence with policy to achieve professional recognition, credentialing, and industrial recognition.
Methods:  This article describes the principles underpinning the notion of rural generalism, the background to the establishment of the Rural Generalist Pathway in Queensland, Australia, how the pathway has been developed to meet the needs of Queensland’s rural and remote communities, the implementation of the pathway, and the implications for other jurisdictions.
Results:  In 2007, 30 trainees commenced on the pathway, with total enrolment now of 182 in 2012. Trainees commence at the start of internship, completing their prevocational training component in postgraduate years 1 to 2. After prevocational certification they undertake advanced specialised training in a range of specialties, and then complete vocational training in a rural location, usually in their 4th to 5th postgraduate years. Trainees complete their general practice training through a Regional Training Provider, and achieve vocational registration by completion of appropriate fellowship assessment requirements. The pathway is managed by a geographically dispersed team of educators, clinicians and managers. The Rural Generalist team provide training and career advice, advocate for trainees and assist with negotiating posts. They map progress of trainees through the Vocational Indicative Planning process and arrange other educational activities including Rural Generalist workshops. Applications are often oversubscribed, with the intake growing to 41 in 2012, located at 10 intern training hospitals. In total 90 trainees have completed advanced specialised training as at the end of 2012.
Conclusion:  The Rural Generalist Pathway includes a challenging prevocational start to the career, the opportunity to specialise in a procedural skill or skills of interest and obtain general practice vocational training in a rural setting and appears to be proving an attractive choice for medical graduates seeking a challenging and varied career. Early evidence suggests that by recognizing and rewarding the worth of rural and remote practice, this strategy is creating its own supply line. From its initial roll-out in Queensland, rural generalist training continues to generate increased interest and enthusiasm across all Australian states and territories wishing to join this new wave of generalist practice. This new generation of health professionals for a new generation of services has the potential to provide the rural medical workforce the bush needs.

Key words: Australia, generalism, pathway, Queensland, rural generalist, rural medical education, vocational training.

This abstract has been viewed 5139 times since 24-May-2013.