Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section Australasian section European section Latin American section North American section
home
login/register
current articles

contribute
information for authors
status/user profile
links/forums
about us

Original Research

Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia

Submitted: 20 March 2015
Revised: 29 October 2015
Accepted: 7 December 2015
Published: 18 March 2016

Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)

Author(s) : Doran FM, Hornibrook J.

Citation: Doran FM, Hornibrook J.  Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia. Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2016; 16: 3538. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=3538 (Accessed 25 September 2017)

ABSTRACT

Introduction:  Little is known about Australian rural women’s overall experiences of accessing an abortion service and the barriers they encounter. Approximately one in three Australian women access an abortion at some time in their lives. Most abortions are undertaken during the first trimester of pregnancy in private clinics. Although both medical and surgical abortions are uncomplicated medical procedures, abortion remains a contentious area of women’s health. Whilst it is clear that rural women experience disparities in relation to access to health care, there is a gap in the evidence on rural women’s experiences of accessing an abortion. The aim of the present study was to identify factors that women in rural New South Wales (NSW) experience in accessing abortion services and suggestions about how rural women could be better supported when seeking access to an abortion service.
Methods:  In-depth qualitative interviews were undertaken with rural women living in NSW who had had an abortion in the previous 15 years. Participants self-selected for a phone or face-to-face interview, in response to promotion of the study through women’s services, community flyers and press releases.
Results:  Rural women in this study experienced many barriers to accessing an abortion. Women travelled 1–9 hours one way to access an abortion in clinics. Several women borrowed money for the abortion fee. Five themes were identified: finding information about the provider; stigma, shame and secrecy; logistics involved in accessing the clinic related to travel, money and support; medical and surgical abortion; and ways rural women could be better supported in this process. Suggestions to improve rural women’s access to abortion services included more affordable services that were 'closer to home' as a way to reduce travel and cost, and to normalise abortion as a women’s health rights issue.
Conclusions:  Despite welcome legal and pharmaceutical reform in Australia, results from this small study indicate that there is a long way to go remove barriers on issues rural women experience in their process of accessing reproductive care, including the pervasiveness of abortion stigma. Services closer to home may help reduce inequities in access to health care experienced by rural women. Strategies such as broader use of tele-health and willingness of general practitioners to become authorised prescribers for medical abortions could help to reduce long distances to travel to services and the financial burden experienced by rural women.

Key words: access to services, Australia, primary care, stigma, women’s health.

This abstract has been viewed 2030 times since 18-Mar-2016.

   
 

   CONTACT US | COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER | ADMIN ONLY