Aboriginal maternal and infant care workers: partners in caring for Aboriginal mothers and babies
Submitted: 2 November 2007
Revised: 10 June 2008
Published: 25 July 2008
Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)
Stamp GE, Champion S, Anderson G, Warren B, Stuart-Butler D, Doolan J, Boles C, Callaghan L, Foale A, Muyambi C.
|Georgina Stamp||Sonia Champion||Geraldine Anderson||Bronwyn Warren||Deanna Stuart-Butler||Jacqueline Doolan||Cheryl Boles||Lisa Callaghan||Anne Foale||Christine Muyambi|
Citation: Stamp GE, Champion S, Anderson G, Warren B, Stuart-Butler D, Doolan J, Boles C, Callaghan L, Foale A, Muyambi C. Aboriginal maternal and infant care workers: partners in caring for Aboriginal mothers and babies. Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2008; 8: 883. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=883 (Accessed 30 June 2016)
Introduction: Aboriginal Maternal and Infant Care (AMIC) workers and midwives work in intellectual and inter-cultural partnerships in a new perinatal care model the Anangu Bibi Family Birthing Program that aims to provide culturally focussed perinatal care for Aboriginal mothers and families at two sites in regional South Australia. This study investigated the views of the AMIC workers and midwives about their roles, their partnership and the program, following the first 45 births.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews with all five AMIC workers and four of the five midwives working in the program were conducted. Tapes were transcribed and main themes extracted.
Results: The AMIC workers’ role included clinical, cultural, social and aspects from the confirmation of pregnancy through to 6-8 weeks after the birth. Themes relating to their work role included: clinical work; social and emotional support; language and advocacy for the partnership: mutually equivalent roles and for the program: clinical benefits and cultural safety. The midwives’ role included clinical practice, skill-sharing and mentoring. Midwives were guided by AMIC workers’ social, cultural and community knowledge. Themes that emerged for the midwives on the partnership were: time and commitment to working inter-culturally; issues with the new AMIC worker role; clinical skill sharing and mentoring; resistance of some hospital midwives; respect for AMIC workers’ cultural knowledge and community links; and two-way learning. Themes of perceived benefit were: increased use of services and cultural benefits.
Conclusions: The study provides a snapshot of a living, developing, inter-cultural partnership established to tackle the vitally important issue of Aboriginal mothers’ and babies’ health. Development of the partnership took commitment and time. There were issues initially with resistance from hospital staff. Skill sharing and two-way learning engendered mutual respect. Clear benefits of the care model were highlighted by both the AMIC workers and midwives while cultural safety was maintained for the Aboriginal mothers and families. The AMIC worker role will continue to require acknowledgement, support and development. This equivalent inter-cultural partnership model has the potential for much wider application and evaluation. Future programs should factor in the time required to build and sustain partnership relationships.
Key words: Aboriginal, antenatal, Australia, birthing, health workers, midwives, partners.
|This abstract has been viewed 8104 times since 25-Jul-2008.|