Loading...
cancel

Original Research

Geographic differences in the experiences of HIV- related stigma for women living with HIV in Northern and rural communities of Ontario, Canada

AUTHORS

Denise Jaworsky1 MD, Clinical Instructor *

Carmen H Logie2 PhD, Assistant Professor

Anne C Wagner3 PhD, Postdoctoral Fellow

Tracey Conway4 Child and Youth Worker Diploma, Research Associate

Angela Kaida5 PhD, Associate Professor and Canada Research Chair in Global Perspectives in HIV and Sexual and Reproductive Health

Alexandra de Pokomandy6 MD, Assistant Professor

Kath Webster7 N/A, Research Associate

Karène Proulx-Boucher8 MA, Research Coordinator

Paul Sereda9 BA, Lead Data Analyst

Mona Loutfy10 MD, Professor

On Behalf Of the CHIWOS Research Team11 N/A, Group Authorship

AFFILIATIONS

1 2775 Laurel Street, 10th Floor Vancouver, BC , Canada V5Z 1M9

2 246 Bloor St. West, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1V4

3 50 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5B 2K3

4, 10 76 Grenville St, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5S 1B3

5, 7 Blusson Hall, Rm 10522, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6

6 2155 Guy Street, Suite 500 Montreal, QC, Canada, H3H 2R9

8 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, Canada, H4A 3J1

9 608-1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6Z 1Y6

11 N/A

ACCEPTED: 13 November 2017


early abstract:

Introduction: In Canada, individuals living in Northern and rural regions report more barriers to health service access. For people living with HIV, these barriers may be exacerbated by experiences of HIV-related stigma and women living with HIV can be disproportionately impacted due to intersections of multiple forms of oppression including racism, sexism and classism. To further understand the impact of geography on the wellbeing of women living with HIV, this study assessed geographic differences in HIV-related stigma experiences among women in the Canadian HIV Women’s Sexual & Reproductive Health Cohort Study (CHIWOS).

Methods: CHIWOS is a multisite cohort study of women living with HIV in Canada that operates under community-based participatory research methodology along with GIPA (greater involvement of people with HIV/AIDS) and MIWA (meaningful involvement of women living with HIV/AIDS) principles.  This analysis compared Peer Research Associate-administered questionnaire data between participants in Northern and Southern Ontario, Canada and also between participants in rural and non-rural Ontario. Northern regions were defined by healthcare delivery jurisdiction. The primary outcome was the 10-item shortened HIV Stigma Scale score. Multivariable linear regression models assessed the association between rural and Northern regions and stigma score.

Results: Sixteen women were excluded due to incomplete HIV Stigma Scale data. Of 701 women included in the analysis, 66 (9.4%) were from Northern regions and 24 (3.4%) were from rural regions. Mean stigma scores were 23.9 (SD 8.0) overall, 26.7 (SD 8.8) in Northern regions, 23.6 (SD 7.9) in Southern regions, 28.3 (SD 10.1) in rural regions, and 23.8 (SD 7.8) in non-rural regions. In multivariable analyses, Northern and rural regions of residence were associated with a 3.05 (95% CI: 0.77, 5.32) and 4.83 (95% CI: 1.37, 8.28) point increase in stigma score, respectively.

Conclusion: Living in both Northern and rural regions of Ontario was associated with higher HIV Stigma Scale scores. These geographic discrepancies in experiences of HIV-related stigma highlight the need for region-specific programs to reduce HIV-related stigma and to support people living with HIV who are impacted by HIV-related stigma, particularly those living in geographically isolated regions. Prior qualitative studies have documented the important impact of HIV-related stigma, and this study supports these observations with quantitative data from a population that is often under-represented in HIV research.