Core drivers of quality : a remote health example from Australia

Context: In July 2005 the National Rural Health Alliance released a discussion paper on advanced nursing practice in rural and remote areas of Australia. The paper called for more debate and research about advanced nursing practice roles, especially on how the roles contribute to quality care and patient health outcomes. Monash University School of Rural Health, Victoria, Australia, completed two studies exploring the role and practice of remote area nurses working autonomously in bush nursing centres in East Gippsland, Victoria. The studies confirmed the nursing role as advanced and expanded, and the care effective and of high quality. The studies also revealed the contribution of the remote area nurse to quality care involved more than demonstrating effective healthcare delivery and evidence based clinical practice. The significance of context emerged as an important determinant. Issue: Articulating measures for quality care in Australian remote health practice is problematic. The concept ‘quality’ is multidimensional and time and context specific. Current Australian health service and professional competency standards fail to combine external structural and organisational factors, and the social and economic situation of a given remote community. Together, these factors create the context, and influence practice and remote health service delivery. It is accepted that context shapes remote nursing practice, however the term ‘context’ is commonly interpreted as an environmental, structural or geographical construct. These terms are valid; however, they do not describe other drivers that impact on remote area nursing and


Context
A recent Australian National Rural Health Alliance discussion paper outlined the role of advanced rural and remote nurses and the benefits of an expanded practice scope for rural and remote communities 1 .Studies have concluded advanced nursing roles deliver high quality effective health care; however, it is recognised that measuring the impacts on health outcomes is difficult 2,3 .What remains to be debated is how an advanced nursing role contributes to quality care.Monash University School of Rural Health recently completed two studies exploring the role and practice of remote area nurses (RANs) working autonomously in bush nursing centres (BNC) in East Gippsland, Victoria 4,5 .
Consistent with measures for advanced nursing competencies in Australia 6 , the studies confirmed the remote nursing role as advanced and expanded, and the care effective and of high quality.However, the studies also revealed the contribution of the nursing role to quality care involved more than demonstrating clinical expertise.The context of practice emerged as an important indicator of quality care 4,5 .The influence of economic structures and community characteristics on remote nursing practice and service delivery is overlooked.
The studies identified four core drivers creating the context: the system, the organisation, the community and the individual.These drivers have shaped current remote nursing practice, and the advanced role has established a standard of quality care to rival large health agencies.This article presents an alternative approach to evaluate the contribution of an advanced RAN role that involves a 360 degree view of the practice environment.The four drivers form the model's framework; interactions between the drivers determine the context and capture the RANs' efforts to sustain high service standards.

What is 'quality care'?
The quest to define 'quality care' has occupied theorists and academics for many years.Debates concede the concept of quality is multidimensional, and time and context specific 7,8 .
In Australia there is need to measure performance to demonstrate service effectiveness and the provision of quality care 7 .However, there are limitations to and gaps in performance measurement in Australia, especially outside the acute hospital system, related to assessment model design and performance indicator development 7 .The validity of measuring health service performance is reliant on the appropriateness and reliability of the indicators 7 .
Attree 8 suggests the following elements are central to a model of quality care: observable attributes; structure, process and outcomes criteria; professional and managerial perspectives; context/environment; and time/era.The latter two elements indicate quality is context and time specific, influenced by various environmental factors.Attree 8 supports the view that individual and societal expectations are influenced by the context of the service; however, adds that the prevailing opinion of the day will influence the organisational culture of the healthcare system and determine quality.
Sidani et al. 9 apply a theory-driven approach to evaluating quality, and identify five factors influencing outcomes: the person receiving care; the professional providing care; the context; the type of care provided; and the timing of outcomes expected from the care provided.The authors conclude that realistic evaluation of quality care requires attending to the factors that affect outcomes.Current Australian health service and professional competency standards fail to combine external structural and organisational factors and the social and economic situation of a given remote community.Professional nursing attributes such as social leadership, community advocacy and capacity building are also ineffectively captured.In the remote context, if quality care is to be assessed, a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between contextual variables, service provision and advanced nursing roles is required.

The role of context
Until recently rural health experts have circumvented the significance of context; however, the importance of location is included as the environment that constructs reality 10 .
There is a growing body of literature exploring the role of context and its relationship to health.Curtis and Jones 11 consider an individual's health experience to be partly dependent on the physical and social environment.Thurston and Meadows 12 discuss the role of place and influence of the rural context on health.Ryan-Nicholls 13 suggest health strategies have centred on the symptoms, rather than the causes of rural health and sustainability problems, indicating health strategy models need to reflect the rural context.
Australian rural researchers exploring mental health and wellbeing in rural Australia believe 'place' influences health variables and health outcomes, with the risk of illness connected to the community and environmental context in which the individual lives 10,14 .The 'vulnerable populations' conceptual model 15 encapsulates the experience of context and focuses on the interrelationships between available resources, relative risk and health status 15 .
It is this inclusive view of context that frames RAN practice in Australia and determines the delivery of quality care.
Consequently measures of service performance and the delivery of quality health care should be placed within a contextual framework.

Australian remote area nurses:
In Australia, RANs generally work and live in small isolated communities.The nurses provide the first point of contact for a range of primary-care functions normally provided by medical practitioners and allied health professionals in urban and large regional centres 1 .Remote area nurses act as sole providers of primary and urgent health care, and frequently extend their skills due to community demand and a lack of any other form of health professional support.In remote areas of Australia, nurse-led health services provide care across the lifespan catering for acute and chronic illnesses, and population-based preventative programs.The role also requires health service management and demands a high level of knowledge and skill 1

Recent studies by Monash University School of Rural
Health, Victoria, explored the role and practice of RANs working autonomously in the East Gippsland BNC.The studies confirmed the role as advanced and expanded, consistent with definitions of RAN practice in other isolated areas of Australia 1 .The care provided was evaluated as effective and of high quality; however, the studies also revealed that the contribution of the nursing role to quality care involved more than demonstrating clinical expertise.
The context of practice emerged as an important indicator of quality care 4,5 .The findings from these studies form the basis of this article and the development of a quality evaluation model, citing the East Gippsland RAN as an example.

The core drivers
The core drivers -the system, the organisation, the community and the individual -are critical elements to understanding the professional role and evaluating the contribution of RANs to quality health care.The 'core drivers' concept has emerged from integration of the Monash studies 4,5 with the contribution of Sidani et al. 9 , who identify five factors influencing outcomes, and the 'clinical value compass' quality improvement model developed by Nelson et al. 16 .Each core driver is important and provides us with areas of significance known to influence dimensions of quality 16 .When core driver factors are considered in addition to the currently used quality measures of financial and usage data, the model provides a more reflective view of the individual situation.
The following is a brief outline of key factors within each driver that have shaped the current context.
The system: Factors considered in 'the system' included: • the political party in power, their policies, programs and preferences • legislation related to health-service delivery, practice and evaluation • credentialling/registration of health service practitioners and providers • workforce issues • regional governance and health service priorities.
The organisation: Factors considered in 'the organisation' include: • strategic plan • health services alliances: local, regional and metropolitan • health-service provision model/s such as: main organization, additional campuses, community health centres or clinics • organizational policies and procedures.
The community: Factors considered in 'the community' include: • service access • community cohesiveness and connectedness • socio-economic status • transport and environment.

The individual (either client or significant other):
Factors considered in 'the individual' include: • experience with illness/ill people • personal beliefs, preferences and expectations • ability to be a 'partner' in care decisions

How remote area nurses contribute to the quality of care: a remote Australian example
Using the 'core driver' model this next section will outline how we applied the model to explore the quality of care in a small isolated community serviced by RANs.
To effectively measure the quality and role contribution of RANs to the health of rural communities, and in an attempt to crystallise the role of context as it contributes quality rural health care, we undertook a 360 degree view of the RANs' practice context using the core drivers model.

The system:
The previous Victorian Government introduced health system reform and massive funding cuts, affecting staff retention and backfill, and service delivery.In remote health services, access to relieving staff and allied health professionals became increasingly difficult, and increased financial competition made it harder for small health agencies to attract funding 4,17 .Isolated communities are difficult to serve due to small population numbers and are able to sustain only basic services 13 .The size of health services impacts on remote area nursing, influenced by a lack of on-site medical and allied health professionals 18 .In East Gippsland, limited resources and cuts to services © MB Burley, P Greene, 2007.A licence to publish this material has been given to ARHEN http://www.rrh.org.au6 resulted in the RANs carrying out non-nursing activities within their practice, and undertaking the roles of multiple health disciplines 5 .In essence the RANs have had to 'fill in the gaps' due to the unavailability of other cost-effective services 18 p.26 .This has meant developing strong networks with health professionals and agencies across the region to ensure remote communities have access to multiple health resources 5 .Maintaining these relationships is vital to protecting the viability and sustainability of nursing services.
The current health services provided by RANs are not adequately funded because the client population does not match the allocated funding model 17 .Classified and funded as Home and Community Care (HACC) agencies, the majority of service users do not fit the classification (people aged over 65 years or with a disability).Consequently many of the services provided fall outside of the scope of HACC programs and are ineligible for growth funding 17 .One reason for mismatched funding is an historical budgeting process that does not reflect actual need 19 .Wakerman suggested adapting resource benchmarks to local conditions, factoring level of need and costs associated with providing remote services 19 .Accessing additional money is necessary for some health services to be sustained.Minimal financial assistance is provided from other sources, including an annual subscription system and donations, although these extra community generated resources do not adequately cover the cost of these services 4 .Access to some local services was reviewed due to financial constraints and lack of available health professionals, including after-hours nursing assistance, visiting maternal and child health nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists 5 .Remote are nurses are now involved in grant applications and managing multilevel funding arrangements.Increasingly complex funding arrangements are considered an impediment to the implementation of sustainable and equitable health-service models 20 .Current financing arrangements limit the ability of remote health services to effectively respond to local needs 20 .Despite arguments of financial inequity, the studies by Monash University determined the various services provided by the East Gippsland RANs met the needs of the local community 4,5 ..This successful collaboration is due to proactive action by the RANs and the culture of RAV to share knowledge and skills and develop roles that will provide better patient outcomes and more efficient and sustainable services.Socially and economically these remote communities experience above average levels of disadvantage with restricted accessibility to goods, services and opportunities for social interaction 26 .Services within the communities have gradually been withdrawn and businesses have closed.

The organisation:
The unemployment rate in all five communities is above the rural Victorian and Victorian averages 17 .The prevalence of mental health issues across East Gippsland is rising 26 ; however, the rise in mental health issues has not been matched by primary mental health services across the region.
The population of these remote communities is ageing, with increasingly complex health needs.Individuals are now expected to be more involved in their health care and need to be more informed of psychological and physical health risks, and chronic disease self-management.The focus has moved from sharing disease knowledge and treatments to equipping patients with the skills and confidence to manage their condition 27 .Appropriate local management of chronic disease necessitates effective case coordination across the care continuum, and linkages with complementary community resources 27 .
Attending to the needs of the total community includes aiming for a quality of life for all who live there.This includes addressing the health and social problems encountered in daily living.Significant industrial and environmental challenges have impacted on the socioeconomic situation and mental wellbeing of East Gippsland's remote communities 26 .Limited educational, employment and recreational opportunities, alongside economic and infrastructure decline, have been identified as contributing factors linked to depression and suicide in young rural Australians 28 .The influence of these events on the health of individuals and communities is difficult to quantify; however, the link between economic hardship and increasing mental health issues cannot be dismissed.This is well supported by social capital and social justice commentators who argue that health is partly dependent on the level of economic inequality [29][30][31][32][33] .
As a cornerstone of primary and public health, the concepts of social and economic justice appear to strongly inform remote nursing practice 34 .The RANs consider health as part of the total community, and participate in advocacy and change, while building on existing strengths of their communities.Remote nurses frequently advocate for individuals and communities on issues of concern, consistent with Averill's findings 34 .Predominantly, RAN practice is patient-centred; however, the focus on community activities is less easily identifiable.Strengthening social capital through voluntary participation and leading by example are unaccounted attributes.

The remote area nurse
Advanced knowledge and skills: Political movements and changing needs of individuals and communities have influenced the development of new roles and responsibilities 35 .In practice, new demands and reduced resources call for a higher level of clinical autonomy 2 .
Central to an advanced nursing role is the continued development of service and care standards, with an holistic rather than technical focus 35 .The studies demonstrated the RANs provide an advanced level of clinical care and implement practice changes according to client need and service demands 4 .This necessitates awareness of local health and social demographics in order to provide appropriate Cognizant that effective and safe practice is founded not only on clinical competence, but also on education 35 , the RANs have undertaken additional education to support role expansion, and the legal and professional issues surrounding these changes 5 34 .In this respect, the RANs contribute to high quality remote health care by providing regular assessments, treatment support, professional collaboration and follow up along the care continuum 5 .

Collaboration and partnerships:
Long before government policy stipulated funded health agencies engage in collaborative care activities, the RANs actively sought outside professional assistance 37 .Recognising a single nurseled primary health service is unable to meet the total needs of a community, the nurses have developed strong linkages with medical and allied health professionals, and acute health and community services.Although the nature of isolated practice requires autonomous decision-making, the nurses frequently communicate with health colleagues 4,5 .
The RANs collaborate with health professionals, social services and government departments to maximise opportunities for equitable health care for remote individuals and communities 5 .The mix of advanced skills, expanded roles and collaborative activities contributes to health enhancement by improving the use of and access to the local health services 4 .
Preventative health: A primary health care approach has reformed areas of the Australian healthcare system, redirecting care approaches back to the community 21 .Access to medical and health information have added to greater public expectations of medical care and health promotion 36 p.65 .Alongside an increase in community responsibility for health care there is an expectation of health professionals to integrate health promotion into practice 21 .
The RANs have incorporated preventative health strategies into their practice based on national trends and local needs 5 .
Farm related injuries and specific injury areas including suicide and self-harm remain high in rural areas 38 .
Implementing effective local injury prevention strategies, like other population-based initiatives, is restricted by geography, local infrastructure, a shortage of rural health services, and appropriate education and training to manage specific injury areas.In their daily practice the RANs act as role models for the community, and work with community groups to provide health promotion activities 5 .The demand for RANs to manoeuvre their practice between individual, primary and public approaches is due in part to the size of the health service, community needs, limited resources and a role that includes an active public interface 5 .This advocacy role extends from the individual to the health and social needs of the total community.
The contribution of RANs to quality remote health care is multifaceted with many role attributes outside formal organisational and nursing quality measures.As a group RANs, committees of management, communities and the auspicing body were successful in achieving accreditation through the Quality Improvement and Community Services accreditation 39 .This achievement demonstrates that the services, facilities and staff maintain a standard that equals that of larger health institutions and community agencies.Delivering efficient healthcare and demonstrating service effectiveness requires adequate resources.However, current funding arrangements do not adequately support the broad range of activities as demonstrated in our remote nursing example.In an era of measuring performance a 'whole of system' review is needed.The core drivers -the system, the organisation, the community and the individual -form a contextual matrix.It is the interaction of the core drivers that shape practice and benchmark the quality of the health care delivered.Context, therefore, forms the overarching framework for evaluating performance, and highlights the contribution of RANs to quality care.

Conclusion
availability of support network.Healthcare professional (centre diamond): Factors considered in relation to the 'healthcare professional' include: • experience • knowledge, attitude and skills • understanding of client/community • qualifications • authorisation, designation or registration.The interrelatedness of the four core drivers also demonstrates a particular focus.The system and organisation have a very strong task focus due to their need to meet reporting deadlines, target numbers for service provision and budget targets.The community and the individual conversely focus on relationships and the need to work/pull together to support, sustain and maintain their health services, health-service providers or community members needing support.The health service provider, in the centre of the model, is the link between all four core drivers and has a direct influence on the quality of care outcomes for the client, community, organisation or the system.Quality of care is the outcome of the interactions and interrelationships of all components in the 'core driver' model.As with any system, a change in one factor has the potential to create change in another.The proposed model represents the core attributes inherent in the concept of 'quality care' in a remote context.The interconnecting circles allow the attributes to be considered separately in context, time and place and in relation to each other.The attributes influence the process of care and achievement of outcomes.The model offered includes these factors and shows the relationship between elements.The model (Fig1) is transferable to other remote nursing contexts; however, the influence of the core drivers will vary according to the context.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Integrated contextual model -four drivers of quality health care.
primary health services matched to broader community needs.The assimilation of local knowledge and resident experiences into service planning is essential to strengthen health outcomes 34 .Forged partnerships, for example with RAV, have resulted in a contextually relevant professional training program.Partnership developments and targeted education are integral to maintaining the delivery of quality emergency and advanced clinical care for the remote communities.Expanding practice scope: Restructuring of local government public health programs and reduced access to health professionals have led the RANs to 'pick up' some programs affected by resource constraints, for example immunisation programs.Other specific services provided to their local communities include womens' health, first-aid training, trauma management and palliative care 4,5 .
Providing quality care is challenging in a remote practice environment dominated by few resources, professional isolation and the culture of the individual community.As this article has attempted to illustrate, demonstrating quality care in the remote context requires more than measuring clinical and service performance indicators.Political ideologies and escalating health costs have led to changes in health care delivery.Funding cuts, the application of health outcome indicators, and increased communitybased health care are also to blame.Primary healthcare and chronic disease-management models have highlighted the responsibility of the health consumer and grounded the role of remote primary-care providers.Changes in government policy and approaches to health care have directly increased the responsibilities of sole RANs.Remote area nurses are now expected to manage and coordinate the health needs of the chronically ill, provide advanced clinical care for acute and urgent presentations, and conduct population-based health preventative programs.These activities occur alongside a growing management role.

Victorian remote area nurses: Until 2005 in the Australian
In 1999 the BNC auspicing body the . Mental health has become a significant part of the nurses' scope of practice.Counselling, support, mental health first-aid training programs, mental health assessments and referrals are some of the new knowledge and skills developed.