Training emergency medicine doctors for rural and regional Australia: can we learn from other countries?

Introduction: Australia is a country with a relatively small rural population dispersed over an enormous area. Issues similar to how best to deliver health services and recruit health professionals to rural areas exist in other countries. For professional and lifestyle reasons, most specialist doctors (including emergency medicine specialists), choose to live and work in major metropolitan centres. Outside the major Australian cities, most presentations to emergency departments are dealt with by ‘nonspecialist’ doctors, often with limited specialist back up. Recruitment of suitably trained medical staff is increasingly difficult. There is increasing reliance on overseas trained doctors from widely varying backgrounds. In Canada and New Zealand, family medicine trained emergency medicine doctors are a significant proportion of the workforce in rural and regional emergency departments. Aim: To undertake a detailed investigation of the non-specialist emergency medicine doctors in Australia, and examine strategies to secure a more highly trained emergency medicine workforce for rural and regional Australia.


Introduction
While the number of specialist emergency physicians in Australia is increasing, most of these doctors practise in large tertiary hospitals.Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee (AMWAC) figures indicate that only 2.5% of emergency specialists practise in rural and regional areas where 28.7% of the population live -a lower proportion than for most other specialties 1 .
Most of the presentations to emergency departments (EDs)   in rural and regional Australia are dealt with by doctors other than emergency specialists.The number of these 'nonspecialist' practitioners in the emergency medicine (EM)   workforce is largely unknown.Many are overseas trained doctors (OTDs) or short term locums recruited to 'areas of need'.The knowledge, skills, qualifications and experience of these doctors vary enormously.The loss of older, highly skilled procedural doctors from rural areas is a matter of concern in all disciplines 2 .
Dealing with medical emergencies is frequently identified by rural doctors as an area of concern due to low caseloads, lack of resources, lack of familiarity with current practices and lack of close support from referral hospitals [3][4][5] .Lack of confidence in dealing with emergencies is also a deterrent to young doctors taking up salaried positions in rural practices and hospitals 6 .A recent study into training prevocational doctors across Australia found only a minority felt adequately prepared for dealing with clinical emergencies 7 .
The challenge is to ensure those medical practitioners in rural and regional areas have the necessary knowledge, skills and support services to safely deliver an acceptable standard of care to the population they serve.
The aim of this study was to undertake a more detailed investigation of the non-specialist EM doctors, as well as to examine ideas and strategies to secure a more highly trained workforce.

Ethics approval
Ethics approval for this research was sought and obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (Tasmania) Network.

Postal survey of emergency department doctors
A total of 340 survey forms were distributed to 57 rural and regional hospitals, and 230 surveys were returned: a response rate of 68%.Of great interest was the finding that 39% of respondents had moved to their current position from a similar rural EM position.The high numbers suggest a significant degree of instability or dissatisfaction with many in the workforce on the move seeking a greater degree of personal and professional satisfaction.Other issues such as pay and conditions, work environment, administrative support and hospital resources were variably rated as positive or negative features.These issues appeared to reflect more the individual hospital rather than the overall profession.
Compatibility with family life also featured as both a positive and negative factor.On the one hand, many doctors (33%) found it attractive to be able to work a predictable shift and leave the 'office' without any responsibilities until the next shift.On the other hand, 26% cited this as a negative factor due to the effect on their family of having to work unsociable hours.There were numerous other negative factors but no one outstanding issue.Most respondents listed multiple negative aspects of the job.These included: • medical staffing levels Only 6% had an intention to increase their involvement in EM.This adds further to the impression that the current workforce has a significant degree of instability and uncertainty for the future.

Interviews and consultations
Interviews were conducted with 53 educators, administrators and employers.The majority (67%) were from Australia and the remainder from Canada and New Zealand.While 73% were clinicians, all interviewees had significant involvement in EM recruitment or education.More than half of those interviewed had worked in another country during some part of their professional career.
There were several consistent themes on workforce issues identified in these interviews: 1.There is a major shortage of suitably trained and experienced doctors to meet the current needs of rural and regional EM.
2. This shortage is expected to worsen in the near future.1.The more specialists view (22% of interviewees): By providing funding and expanding the number of specialist trainees, as well as making conditions more attractive for rural specialists, this will ultimately translate into a highly skilled medical workforce in the rural and regional hospitals of the same standard as major urban hospitals.
2. The more general practitioners view (30%): The rural and regional workforce is the domain of    17 .Most CCFP-EM graduates end up practising purely EM rather than a blend of general practice and EM 18 .

Role of other health professionals
The Productivity Commission report also recommended that other health professionals should have an expanded role in providing services that have traditionally been provided by the medical profession 12 .In Australia, emergency nurse practitioners (ENP) now exist in some major metropolitan hospitals.To date, ENPs have largely been tasked with seeing and treating patients with minor complaints, with evidence suggesting they are as good as, if not better than junior doctors 19,20 .In remote communities, nurses have Nurse practitioners and other service providers are likely to play a greater role but it remains to be seen if such health professionals could fill the gap between acute primary care and specialist EM practice.The 'non-specialist' EM pathways that have been developed in New Zealand and Canada may be useful models for the needs of rural and regional Australia.

Recommendations
• A specific Australian postgraduate qualification in EM should be developed that meets the needs of doctors who wish to practise outside major city institutions.
• The delivery of teaching and clinical experience for such a qualification would, as far as possible, be located in those institutions and communities that already have a strong rural/regional focus and commitment to medical education.
• Such a qualification should be recognised as a legitimate career path of higher training within the field of EM and be rewarded with competitive remuneration and employment conditions to ensure it remains an attractive option for EM practitioners.
survey of doctors: Convenience sampling was used to survey ED doctors working in hospitals in RRMA classification 3 and 4 areas of Australia 8 .These EDs had 10 000 to 30 000 presentations per annum.Survey forms were distributed to any doctor working in an EDirrespective of seniority, employment status or level of training.A total of 18 questions were asked covering educational background, level of training, relevant experience, positive and negative aspects of the job, as well as plans for the future.All responses were anonymous.Interviews with stakeholders: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals and representatives of organisations identified as key persons, stake holders, or participants in the education, training and service delivery of EM in Australia, New Zealand and Canada.All interview transcripts were de-identified.Persons interviewed were specifically asked to comment on perceived difficulties in recruitment and retention, educational standards and possible solutions to workforce shortages.

Training and qualifications :
Just over half (55%) of the respondents had received their basic training in Australia or New Zealand (Fig 1).While most of those trained overseas had completed the Australian Medical Council examination and were eligible for full registration, a significant proportion had not, and were practising with some form of limited or conditional registration.Just over one-third (35%) of the respondents held a 'relevant' fellowship diploma for the position occupied (Fig 2).In all, 58 doctors were Fellows of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), 34 were Fellows of the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine (ACRRM) and only 13 were Fellows of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (FACEM); 21 respondents were dual or triple fellowship holders.A slightly greater percentage of respondents (38%) were non-fellowship holders but held one or more relevant 'short course' certificates in early management of severe trauma, emergency life support, advanced paediatric life support or other similar emergency courses.Of concern is the 27% of respondents who held no relevant fellowship nor any relevant certificate in EM.While the relevance of any particular qualification is debatable, and it can be argued that knowledge and skills can be acquired by 'on-the-job' training, the successful completion of such qualifications demonstrates a commitment to maintaining and advancing knowledge.Of similar concern was the finding that less than half the respondents participated in any formal continuing medical education (CME) or maintenance of professional standards (MOPS) program.Previous rural experience: 23% of those surveyed had no prior rural experience before coming to their existing job (Fig 3).The figure was slightly higher for OTDs (29%) coming to work in the relatively unsupervised rural environment.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Respondents by eligibility for registration.OTD, overseas trained doctors; AMC, Australian Medical Council.

Figure 3 :
Figure 3: Respondents by previous rural experience.

•
demanding work load • excessive working hours • difficulty accessing educational activities • fear of litigation • access block • lack of peer support Future employment and training: While one-third of respondents reported no intention to change their current situation, the majority indicated they were likely to substantially change their situation (Fig 4).For many, this included moving to another hospital or clinical area, reducing their hours of work, reducing involvement in emergency medicine, or leaving the workforce altogether.

3 .
The heavy reliance on doctors educated in other countries creates additional problems relating to standard of training, communication, cultural issues, and resources required to support their professional development.

4 .
There is more to recruiting and retaining than simply offering larger remuneration which may only create a more volatile workforce.Not surprisingly, there was considerable divergence of opinion on what could or should be done to improve the situation.There were four broad, but somewhat contradictory, views expressed on future directions for the EM workforce (Fig 5):

3 .
generalists and there needs to be more funded GP training posts.Existing training schemes encompass EM and this is quite appropriate for most rural and regional areas together with existing short courses and locally based training.The imported workforce view (10%): As there will be insufficient locally trained staff for the foreseeable future, there should be aggressive recruiting from other countries with a 'fast tracking' process to expedite visas and registration for these doctors.This should be linked to an education system to bring them up to the required standard as soon as possible.4. The radical view (38%): Traditional specialist college-based education systems have failed to meet the EM workforce needs of rural and regional communities.The flow-on effect from additional undergraduate and specialist training positions is uncertain.Alternative and innovative ways of addressing the problem are a matter of urgency.Suggested strategies included: • expanded general practice/family medicine curricula • university based courses • distance education modules • alternative pathways to specialist qualifications • recognition of overseas EM qualifications • expanded short course training • further development of nurse practitioner programs, expanded-scope paramedics and other alternative forms of service delivery.

Figure 5 :
Figure 5: Suggested solutions to rural emergency medicine workforce shortages.OTDs, overseas trained doctors.
traditionally had an expanded scope of practice that recognises the need to provide a diverse range of services without immediate medical support.Similarly, rural paramedics are seeking to extend their scope of practice beyond that of their urban colleagues21 .These concepts have not been enthusiastically embraced by long-established medical organisations.Conclusions Emergency medicine remains a popular career choice for postgraduate training.The excitement, challenge and variety of clinical work have strong appeal.The opportunity to undertake training part time and practise part time makes EM a career more compatible with family life than many other medical pathways.A significant difficulty appears to be maintaining enthusiasm and interest in those attracted to rural practice in the first place.The apparent instability in the workforce and the large number of negative issues raised in the workforce survey suggest that much more needs to be done as part of ensuring a viable career structure for rural EM doctors.Recurring themes of remuneration, workforce shortages, family needs, after hours and on call commitments, and access to training and professional development, are widespread in all rural health disciplines.For many people, the short term solution of using increasing numbers of OTDs from developing countries raises moral and ethical questions as the supply from other affluent 'western' countries dries up.The workforce survey revealed a high level of perceived need to undertake further training in EM.It is apparent that there is a degree of professional jealousy and disagreement between the various players in medical education and service delivery.Careful consideration must be given to the implementation of any new training program to ensure it fills a need and complements existing educational opportunities.