Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section European section International section Latin American section North American section
current articles
information for authors
status/user profile
about us

Abstract online early

University Departments of Rural Health: Is a national network of multidisciplinary academic departments in Australia making a difference?     [ Original Research ]

Submitted: 13 January 2017
Revised: 24 May 2017
Accepted: 12 June 2017

Author(s) : Humphreys J, Lyle D, Barlow V.


Introduction: In 1996, the Australian Government established the first regionally-based, multi-professional University Department of Rural Health (UDRH). Currently, there are 12 UDRHs located across Australia. The UDRH program aims to provide education and training facilities in non-metropolitan centres, thereby helping to attract health professionals to practise in rural and remote communities. UDRHs operate as clinical academic units located within the health service sector. They have sufficient critical mass to develop and deliver academically enriched clinical education and training, and the capacity to manage and coordinate placements and undertake targeted research relevant to the region. This paper evaluates the role and contribution of UDRHs to teaching, research and health service performance in rural and remote
Australia, prior to expansion funding announced in 2015.
Methods: Mixed methods were employed, combining administrative data from 2009-2013, Australian Bureau of Statistics Census data 2011, and interviews with key UDRH staff to assess UDRH teaching and research activity, contributions to workforce and service development, and engagement with rural communities.
Descriptive statistical methods were used to determine geographical coverage of UDRHs across Australia, and the pattern and trends of student education and training activity. Content analysis was used to identify clinical training programs, additional educational opportunities delivered by the UDRHs, and collaborative projects that demonstrated engagement in their region. The main outcome measures included: UDRH coverage of rural and remote Australia; student activity and contributions, including research outputs, to rural workforce and service development; and engagement with rural communities.
Results: All UDRHs participated in the study. In 2013, 18
years after its inception, the UDRH Network footprint covered 3.152 million km2 - 40.9% of the Australian landmass, with a population of 2,207,426. An estimated 18% of annual university enrolments in ten leading health disciplines accessed UDRH clinical placements. Common features across all UDRH student programs included availability of cross-cultural, inter-professional and simulation training, orientation of students to placements, and UDRH managed accommodation. Other features varied by context across the Network. The UDRHs generated 220 peer-reviewed papers in 2013 of which, 86% were applied research and 407% addressed some aspect of rural and/or remote health. UDRHs also contributed academic input to many significant regional projects that aim to develop new models of care, improve service access, support better-trained health professionals, or build capacity in organizations
and communities.
Conclusions: Since their inception twenty years ago, UDRHs have become well-integrated entities, effectively embedded within their regional communities. This evaluation shows that UDRHs are making a difference based on an assessment of geographical coverage and activity, relevant contribution, and engagement in rural and remote communities. The UDRH Network now operates across a substantial geographical footprint fulfilling an essential academic and workforce development role within the health system in rural and remote Australia. The funding of the UDRHs has recently been doubled to support increased training activity and expand their regional footprint. The Australian Government recently announced funding to establish three additional UDRHs in 2017. As the UDRH Network approaches this new phase of its existence, the next stage of evaluation should focus on providing evidence on the specific workforce, health service, and population health outcomes.

This abstract online early has been viewed 297 times since 12-Jun-2017.