Rural and Remote Health Journal photo
African section Asian section Australasian section European section Latin American section North American section
current articles

information for authors
status/user profile
about us

Original Research

Why do medical graduates choose rural careers?

Submitted: 9 September 2008
Revised: 19 January 2009
Published: 28 February 2009

Full text: You can view the full article, or view a printable version.
Comments: (login to access the comments on this article)

Author(s) : Henry JA, Edwards BJ, Crotty B.

John HenryBrian EdwardsBrendan Crotty

Citation: Henry JA, Edwards BJ, Crotty B.  Why do medical graduates choose rural careers? Rural and Remote Health (Internet) 2009; 9: 1083. Available: (Accessed 18 October 2017)


Introduction:  This study is based on the metaphor of the ‘rural pipeline’ into medical practice. The four stages of the rural pipeline are: (1) contact between rural secondary schools and the medical profession; (2) selection of rural students into medical programs; (3) rural exposure during medical training; and (4) measures to address retention of the rural medical workforce.
Methods:  Using the rural pipeline template we conducted a literature review, analysed the selection methods of Australian graduate entry medical schools and interviewed 17 interns about their medical career aspirations.
Results:  Literature review: The literature was reviewed to assess the effectiveness of selection practices to predict successful gradation and the impact of rural pipeline components on eventual rural practice. Undergraduate academic performance is the strongest predictor of medical course academic performance. The predictive power of interviews is modest. There are limited data on the predictive power of other measures of non-cognitive performance or the content of the undergraduate degree. Prior rural residence is the strongest predictor of choice of a rural career but extended rural exposure during medical training also has a significant impact. The most significant influencing factors are: professional support at national, state and local levels; career pathway opportunities; contentedness of the practitioner’s spouse in rural communities; preparedness to adopt a rural lifestyle; educational opportunities for children; and proximity to extended family and social circle. Analysis of selection methods: Staff involved in student selection into 9 Australian graduate entry medical schools were interviewed. Four themes were identified: (1) rurality as a factor in student selection; (2) rurality as a factor in student selection interviews; (3) rural representation on student selection interview panels; (4) rural experience during the medical course. Interns’ career intentions: Three themes were identified: (1) the efficacy of the rural pipeline; (2) community connectedness through the rural pipeline; (3) impediments to the effect of the rural pipeline, the most significant being a partner who was not committed to rural life
Conclusion:  Based on the literature review and interviews, 11 strategies are suggested to increase the number of graduates choosing a career in rural medicine, and one strategy for maintaining practitioners in rural health settings after graduation.

Key words:  graduate entry, rural pipeline, school admission criteria, student selection.

This abstract has been viewed 6584 times since 28-Feb-2009.