Original Research

'It could have been a lot worse': the psychological effects of farm-related serious injury in Victoria

AUTHORS

name here
Margaret Murray1
BSc(Hons), Research Assistant *

Jessica Beattie2 B APPSCI, MHHSM, Lecturer in Rural General Practice (Program Development and Support)

Candis McLeod3 0, Administrative Assistant

Daryl Pedler4 D.H.S, General Practitioner

name here
Susan A Brumby5
PhD, Director National Centre for Farmer Health

Belinda Gabbe6 PhD, Head of Pre-hospital, Emergency and Trauma Research

CORRESPONDENCE

*Ms Margaret Murray

AFFILIATIONS

1, 2 Deakin University, Geelong, Australia

3 School of Medicine, Warrnambool Clinical School, South West Healthcare Warrnambool, Victoria 3280, Australia

4 Rural Community Clinical School (RCCS), Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria 3280, Australia

5 National Centre for Farmer Health Deakin University, Western District Health Service, Hamilton, Victoria 3300, Australia

6 Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia

PUBLISHED

14 September 2019 Volume 19 Issue 3

HISTORY

RECEIVED: 8 February 2019

REVISED: 27 June 2019

ACCEPTED: 6 July 2019

CITATION

Murray M, Beattie J, McLeod C, Pedler D, Brumby SA, Gabbe B.  'It could have been a lot worse': the psychological effects of farm-related serious injury in Victoria. Rural and Remote Health 2019; 19: 5323. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH5323

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSgo to url

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence


abstract:

Introduction:  The psychological response to injury is an important factor in recovery, and the development of psychological problems can result in a delay or inability to return to pre-injury function, including return to work. Farming is widely acknowledged as a stressful occupation, with non-injured farmers already at an increased risk of developing significant psychological problems, including high levels of stress and depression, and increased rates of suicide. This study aimed to investigate the psychological effects of serious farm-related injury on farmers, and how this influences their recovery.
Methods:  This was a qualitative study of 31 farmers in the state of Victoria, Australia, who sustained major trauma between 2007 and 2013. Participants were identified using the Victorian State Trauma Registry and underwent an in-depth, semi-structured telephone interview. Recruitment continued until data saturation was achieved, and thematic analysis was used to identify important themes from the data.
Results:  For many farmers, the traumatic circumstances and ongoing impact of their injury are life-changing. In this study, the psychological effects of sustaining a major farm-related injury varied between participants; however, four major interconnected themes were identified: importance of a pragmatic outlook; grief, helplessness and loss of independence; traumatic thoughts post-injury; and the importance of the support network and community. The findings of this study highlight both a reluctance for psychological assistance as well as the importance of psychological resilience and support networks to recovery.
Conclusion:  Overall, a positive outlook was found to be the primary enabler in the farmers’ recovery. It is recommended that injured farmers should be provided with additional psychological support and advice to aid in their recovery. Additionally, psychological support services should be extended to include both the family network and the broader farming community, as these were found to experience significant short- and long-term stress following farmers’ injury.

Keywords:

agriculture, Australia, farm injury, mental health, resilience, trauma.

full article:

Introduction

The agriculture industry has one of the highest workplace injury and illness rates in Australia, with an incidence rate of 18.7 serious injury claims per 1000 employees1. The nature of the farm environment results in a high number of farm-related injuries, with reported figures representing only a fraction of the actual number of people affected2. Hazards present on the farm may include machinery, chemicals, animals and those associated with extreme weather conditions. This, combined with an ageing work force who often work alone and are reluctant to engage in farm safety activities, contributes to the high rates of farm-related accidents3.

The psychological response to injury is an important factor in recovery, and the development of psychological problems can result in a delay or inability to return to pre-injury functioning, including return to work4. A number of psychological factors can play a key role in delaying a person’s return to work after sustaining a serious injury, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, acute stress disorder, depression and anxiety5. A descriptive study by Buodo et al evaluated injured workers and found that 49.4% reported both depressive and post-traumatic symptoms following an occupational injury6. Farming is widely acknowledged as a stressful occupation, with non-injured farmers already at an increased risk of developing significant psychological problems, including high levels of stress, symptoms indicative of depression and increased rates of suicide7-9. A study by Judd et al10 examined the factors contributing to the increased risk of suicide amongst Australian farmers, and found that barriers to seeking help from formal health providers included limited accessibility within a rural location, and the stigma around mental illness. A general reluctance for farmers to acknowledge and seek help for any health problems was also reported, although, in her work on health, wellbeing and safety of farmers across Australia, Brumby11 found farmers were interested in their health and wellbeing but the context to engage and seek assistance was important. Farmers were more likely to turn to their own families and communities for support10. This reluctance to seek outside help for themselves has the potential to be detrimental to their health in the long term12.

Despite their reluctance to seek help, personality traits such as conscientiousness, resilience and determination have been found to be significantly higher amongst farmers compared to non-farmers10. It is suggested that these characteristics may help protect farmers against psychological distress, with studies highlighting an individual’s psychological resilience as a good indicator of their ability to cope with their injuries13. This resilience amongst farmers is also fostered by the support within their rural community14. Informal networks within most farming communities have been found to give farmers with disabilities the encouragement needed to access both social and hands-on support15. An exploratory study by Robertson et al8 found that farmers often experienced emotional anguish as a result of serious injury and that practical help from community members was crucial to the survival of the farm.

In addition to valuable community support, returning to work either on the farm or to off-farm employment has demonstrated a decrease in the levels of distress experienced by farmers16. The Australian Rural Mental Health Study found that those unemployed and permanently unable to work had the highest distress rates and those who were retired had the lowest rates17. A similar finding was observed by Reed16 who reported that farmers with upper-extremity amputations who had returned to working full-time on the farm experienced an improvement in their overall recovery. In addition, farmers who experienced a significant delay in returning to work after sustaining an injury were more likely to present with symptoms of depression16. The presence of enduring psychological symptoms post-injury has been found to be a predictor of workers who will experience delays in returning to work18.  

Mental health issues following a severe physical injury have been widely reported in the literature and range from general anxiety and distress to psychiatric diagnoses such as post-traumatic stress disorder19. However, limited research has investigated the psychological impacts of sustaining a farm-related serious injury. Additional qualitative research is necessary to provide in-depth knowledge and understanding about farmers’ experiences post-injury.

This article is an extension of a larger study conducted by Beattie et al20 and aimed to specifically explore the psychological impacts of sustaining a farm-related serious injury, and whether the experiences of farmers suggest areas for improvement in post-injury psychological care.

Methods

Participants

The Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) was used to identify adults (aged 18 years or over at the time of injury) who had experienced a farm-related major trauma between January 2007 and December 2013 in the state of Victoria, Australia. A more detailed description of the inclusion criteria and methodology can be found at Beattie et al20. The VSTR is used to routinely follow up all survivors to hospital discharge by telephone interview at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-injury to collect information about return to work, function, pain and health-related quality of life21. The VSTR database identified 323 patients who met the inclusion criteria, and they were subsequently sent a letter from VSTR staff inviting them to participate in the study.

Data collection

Thirty-one people agreed to participate in the study and took part in an in-depth, semi-structured telephone interview, which focused on their experiences since the injury. Interviews were conducted between August and October 2016, recorded by a digital voice recorder, were transcribed verbatim and collated using the qualitative data analysis software NVivo v11 (QSR International; http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo). Participant recruitment continued until it was determined that data saturation had been achieved and no new themes were identified.

This article focused specifically on the analysis related to the psychological effects of sustaining a farm-related serious injury. Interview topics employed during in-depth semi-structured interviews with participants took the form of the following questions:

  • Has there been any impact of the injury on you emotionally?
  • How would you describe the impact of your injury on your life so far?
  • What do you feel helped your recovery the most?
  • What, if anything, has made it harder for you to recover?

Qualitative analysis

Two researchers (JB and MM) conducted thematic coding independently, coding each interview to generate initial themes. Common themes were discussed in collaboration with the entire research team and a thematic framework was developed. This framework revealed a subset of themes relating to the psychological effects of a serious farm-related injury, which is the focus of this article. A more detailed description of this framework can be found at Beattie et al20. To illustrate emerging themes, quotes from the participants’ transcripts have been extracted from the interviews as described by Green and Thorgood22.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Deakin Human Research Ethics Committee (project number 2016-054) in July 2016.

Results

Demographic data

Demographic data, including type and cause of injury, were extracted from the VSTR database for all eligible participants. Eighty-two percent of participants were male and the mean age of participants was 58 years. A complete analysis of the patient demographics of the study participants and the eligible VSTR cohort has been published previously20.

Key themes

Four themes related to the psychological effects of major farm-related injury were identified: the importance of a pragmatic outlook; grief, helplessness and loss of independence; traumatic thoughts post-injury; and the importance of the support network and community.

The importance of a pragmatic outlook:  Farmers frequently credited their ability to recover to their own determination and resilient nature. Post-injury, many farmers reported their emotional outlook shifted towards having a greater appreciation for life and feeling fortunate that they survived the incident.

Any near-death experience makes you feel happy today that you’re still here. (Male, quad bike, multiple fractures)

It could have been a lot worse. (Male, fall from structure, fractured pelvis)

Responses reflecting the importance of maintaining a positive outlook were particularly evident among farmers who described themselves as having an optimistic predisposition prior to injury. What characterised their statements was the general belief that a pragmatic mindset would help them through their recovery.

I’ve got a good outlook. Don’t whine about anything, just look forward and get on with it. If it hurts, it doesn’t matter, just do it. (Male, firearm incident, chest and abdominal injuries)

I’ve always looked at the glass half full and I think that does help. Just your general outlook on life helps you when you run into tough times. (Male, fall from a horse, spinal injury)

As an adjunct to a pragmatic outlook, farmers acknowledged the importance of intrinsic motivation as an enabler in the recovery process.

If you had no motivation you’d be in serious trouble. You’d just drop into an abyss. (Male, fall from structure, multiple fractures)

In particular, the farming enterprise was acknowledged as a strong motivating factor in recovery. The sense that the farm came first, before their own health, was expressed by a number of farmers and was a recurring theme throughout the interviews. In particular, a number of farmers expressed their concern that, despite experiencing an impact on their psychological wellbeing, they simply did not have the time or resources available to focus on their mental state.

I couldn’t afford the time to waste on depression because I had a business to run, even when I was sick, and it was just time I needed. (Male, fall from structure, multiple fractures)

I just don’t have time to feel sorry for myself. (Female, fall from a horse, multiple fractures)

Grief, helplessness and loss of independence:  Despite the reported importance of maintaining a pragmatic mindset for recovery, due to the severity and traumatic nature of their injuries, many participants experienced ongoing emotional impacts. Helplessness emerged as a prominent theme and was often accompanied by frustration and grief for the loss of their pre-injury life on the farm.

Grieving the loss of your life you used to have. Even now, I don’t go outside much because I don’t like seeing people from the old life, people you used to know. I feel embarrassed. (Female, fall from a horse, fractured vertebrae)

In particular, farmers with an ongoing physical disability spoke about an overall lack of independence experienced as a direct result of their injuries. Despite an overall aversion to asking for help and an avoidance of relying on others and being a burden, farmers reported having to rely on both family and carers throughout their recovery.

You lost all your independence. You rely on everyone else to help, otherwise, you’re a dead loss. (Male, injured by cattle, brain injury)

I’m an independent person, I don’t need a great deal. I’ve got a very good family and they help. I’ve never asked for much. I don’t ask for much help. I don’t like to try to burden anyone else. (Male, injured by cattle, brain injury)

Traumatic thoughts post-injury:  The farmers reportedly became more aware of their vulnerability and experienced vivid mental replays of the event. Particularly in the months immediately following the trauma, they would replay the events leading up to their injury in their minds. This was reported to contribute to the feelings of anxiety during their recovery. A number of farmers who experienced this anxiety reported that their fear gradually subsided over the following weeks and months.

I suppose its Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder to a certain extent, but occasionally, in the middle of the night, I’ll relive it all … it’s still up front and centre sometimes. (Male, quad bike, multiple fractures)

I had a mental replay of the whole incident, which went round my mind endlessly, every waking hour. And then that slowly became less, to where it would just become a snippet. (Male, fall from a horse, multiple fractures)

I struggled with anxiety whilst being out amongst people, particularly at shopping centres that were very busy, towards the start. Definitely, at the start, I just panicked. (Female, kicked by a horse, isolated head injury)

The importance of the support network and community:  The majority of farmers referred to individuals in their immediate environment, including partners, family members, friends and other individuals who impacted their life (such as medical professionals and community members), as being crucial to their ability to psychologically recover from their injuries.

If I didn’t have family it may have been a different ballgame. It’s hard to say, isn’t it? But I know they did a lot … I don’t know how people survive without it really, without a friend or a family member. (Female, fall, multiple fractures)

I wanted to do things on the farm but I couldn’t do it. Without support from my wife I wouldn’t have been able to cope with it. (Male, injured by cattle, brain injury)

Various coping strategies were employed by the farmers to aid in their recovery. In particular, maintaining their connections to the outside world by meeting with friends for a coffee, or visiting the general practitioner for mental health consultations, were frequently reported.

And I think if people come or you make an appointment to go, or you make plans to meet somebody for a cup of tea or coffee or something. That helps. To talk to someone, I think. (Female, fall, brain injury)

The GP [helped], I was there every month, and he did a mental health check for me as well. (Male, injured by cattle, brain injury)

Some farmers felt the injury had more of a psychological impact on their partner than it did on them. Often farmers could not remember the immediate aftermath of the injury, but the witnesses who were either present or found the injured farmer were left traumatised by the event. There were situations where the farmers had to cease the activity in which they were injured, not because of their own anxiety, but due to the anxiety of their partner. In some cases, the traumatised family member required counselling.

It’s had an effect on other people, it’s not so much me. It stopped me doing stuff I want to do because I’m not allowed to [by family] … it’s had an effect on a lot of other people. (Male, firearm incident, chest and abdominal injuries)

She’ll [wife] just keep reflecting on it. She’ll keep saying how lucky I was and it was the worst day of her life. (Male, firearm incident, chest and abdominal injuries)

Through the whole process it was pretty tough on her [wife] because she had to do a lot of running around, and a lot of not knowing what’s going on. It’s often easier for the patient. (Male, injured by cattle, spinal cord injury)

It’s affected my wife more than me, quite a bit more. We did get her to go for a bit of counseling for post-traumatic stress. (Male, injured by a horse, multiple fractures)

Discussion

For many farmers, the traumatic circumstances and ongoing impact of their injury are life-changing. The findings of this study highlight both a reluctance to lose their independence, as well as the importance of psychological resilience and support networks on their recovery.

Individual volition and personal values were found to have contributed significantly to a farmer’s ability to recover from their injury. In particular, a number of farmers commented that their situation could have been worse and they were grateful to be alive. However, despite many farmers believing in the effectiveness and importance of maintaining a pragmatic outlook post-injury, previous research has identified farmers as being reluctant to speak about any psychological distress due to stigma and concern of being labelled as a ‘whinger’12. Farmers are known for their stoic nature; however, this characteristic could potentially have an adverse impact on their psychological health in the long term23. Programs and services aimed at improving the long-term mental health of farmers are paramount in rural communities, and such services must be tailored to meet the needs of this particular population group (ie be farmer-friendly). In rural communities there are many opportunities to contribute to the health and wellbeing of farmers and these opportunities exist not just in the health and medical domain. As Brumby11 highlighted, the health and wellbeing of farmers and their families rely on a broad group of people and institutions who play a role in rural communities, including educators, agribusinesses, vets, government departments, fire services, trusted advisors, and health and medical practitioners. All of these people interact with farmers and their families. Current services available to Australian farmers include community-based programs such as Look over the Farm Gate, which aims to increase mental health awareness, build community resilience and encourage local action by farmers looking out for each other24. The present study highlights the need for additional targeted psychological support services to be made available, particularly focusing on injured farmers, noting that the context for engagement of farmers is vital to encourage participation. A peer-to-peer support method could also be helpful to engage reluctant farmers.

Returning to work following a serious injury can have a significant impact on a person’s psychological wellbeing and has been linked to positive mental health outcomes25. Following their serious injury, the farming cohort in this study experienced frustration and a sense of grief for the loss of their pre-injury life. Regaining the ability to return to work on the farm was reported as a key motivator for their psychological recovery and helped foster feelings of independence, which many farmers felt they had lost. However, similar to other occupations, farmers require additional support in order to return to work on the farm. In particular, safety and rehabilitation specialists with a knowledge of different farming enterprises are ideally placed to facilitate this support. A farmer’s mental recovery can be aided by amending daily farming tasks to assist in their ability to return to work before they are fully physically recovered. Additionally, early psychological intervention has been shown to improve the chances of returning to work after an occupational injury18. This requires the identification and management of psychological morbidity post-injury by healthcare professionals who are treating their physical injuries26. Farmers then need to receive access to appropriate psychological support that meets their individual needs and diagnosis, and is based on evidence-based principles26. Farmers who regained their independence following their injury also highlighted the importance of receiving much-needed emotional support from their partners, family, and community members. This finding is also supported by Gerbic27, who identified that encouragement received from family and friends is crucial to recovery.

Mental health professionals may be well situated to help improve the personal, social and occupational function of injured individuals; however, it was more often family, friends and community who provided the injured farmers with everyday support. While the support of family and friends makes a positive contribution to recovery27, the ongoing impact of a farm injury is not isolated to the individual who sustains the injury. A partner or family members, friends and the wider community are often directly impacted as a flow-on effect of the injury, as carers, helpers on the farm or picking up extra tasks at a community level, as reported by Brumby28. In some cases, the trauma was found to have a more profound psychological effect on the spouse or family member. This happened for myriad reasons, including witnessing the incident or the immediate aftermath and fear for the health of the loved one, combined with additional stressors such as caring for the injured spouse or family member, day-to-day running of the farm, and increased financial concerns. This suggests that families, as providers of care and support, are not only extremely important in the rehabilitation process, but are also vulnerable to experiencing stress and often require additional support themselves. Specific areas of improvement for the management of farm-related injuries are recommended and include the provision of additional support to manage the farm in the short term16, as well as easily accessible financial and psychological support for the affected spouse and family members.

Limitations

The present study’s results reflect the individual experiences that have been captured at a particular point in time. However, due to the time elapsed between the injury and subsequent interviews the accuracy and completeness of patient recall is a potential limitation29. Although attempts were made to accurately represent the experiences of the farmers through the interview process, recruitment may not have accurately reflected the demographics of the entire VSTR farm injury cohort20. In particular, the variability of the cause of farm injury for the participants makes comparisons with populations who sustained traumatic injuries tentative. Additionally, participants were only recruited from one Australian state: Victoria.

Conclusion

Overall, a pragmatic outlook was found to be the primary enabler in the farmers’ recovery. It is recommended that injured farmers be provided with additional psychological support and advice to aid in their recoveries. Furthermore, specific psychological support services should be extended to include both the family network and the wider farming community, as they were found to experience significant stress both short- and long-term after the farmers’ injuries.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Victorian State Trauma Registry Monitoring Group (VSTORM), who manage the VSTR. This project was funded by Western Alliance. BG was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT170100048) during the preparation of this manuscript.

references:

1 Safe Work Australia. Work-related injury and disease. 2008. Available: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/book/work-related-injury-and-disease-key-whs-statistics-australia-2018#serious-claims-by-industry-2016 (Accessed 19 June 2019).
2 Mather C, Lower T. Farm injury In Tasmania. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2001; 9(5): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1584.2001.00414.x PMid:11736843
3 Safe Work Australia. Agriculture. 2018. Available: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/agriculture#types-and-causes-of-injury (Accessed 19 June 2019).
4 Bryant RA, Nickerson A, Creamer M, O’Donnell M, Forbes D, Galatzer-Levy I, et al. Trajectory of post-traumatic stress following traumatic injury: 6-year follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry 2015; 206(5): 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.145516 PMid:25657356
5 Davydow DS, Gifford JM, Desai SV, Bienvenu OJ, Needham DM. Depression in general intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review. Intensive Care Medicine 2009; 35(5): 796-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-009-1396-5 PMid:19165464
6 Buodo G, Novara C, Ghisi M, Palomba D. Posttraumatic and depressive symptoms in victims of occupational accidents. Depression Research and Treatment 2012; 2012: 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/184572 PMid:22690334
7 Fraser CE, Smith KB, Judd F, Humphreys JS, Fragar LJ, Henderson A. Farming and mental health problems and mental illness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 2005; 51(4): 340-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764005060844 PMid:16400909
8 Robertson SM, Murphy DJ, Davis LA. Social and emotional impacts of farmwork injuries: an exploratory study. Journal of Rural Health 2006; 22(1): 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00001.x PMid:16441333
9 Donham KJ, Thelin A. Agricultural medicine occupational and environmental health for the health professions. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
10 Judd F, Jackson H, Komiti A, Murray G, Fraser C, Grieve A, et al. Help-seeking by rural residents for mental health problems: the importance of agrarian values. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2006; 40(9): 769-776. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01882.x PMid:16911752
11 Brumby S. Farm work and family health: a study on farming family heath across selected agricultural Industries in Australia. Doctoral dissertation. Bendigo: La Trobe University, 2013.
12 Kennedy AJ, Maple MJ, McKay K, Brumby SA. Suicide and accidental death in Australia’s rural farming communities: a review of the literature. Rural and Remote Health 2014; 14(1): 2517. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/2517 (Accessed 15 November 2018).
13 Stewart DE, Yuen T. A systematic review of resilience in the physically ill. Psychosomatics 2011; 52(3): 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2011.01.036 PMid:21565591
14 Hegney DG, Buikstra E, Baker P, Rogers-Clark C, Pearce S, Ross H, et al. Individual resilience in rural people: a Queensland study, Australia. Rural and Remote Health 2007; 7(4): 620. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/620 (Accessed 15 November 2018).
15 Lustig D, Weems GH, Strauser D. Rehabilitation service patterns: a rural/urban comparison of success factors. Journal of Rehabilitation 2004; 70(3): 13-19.
16 Reed D. Understanding and meeting the needs of farmers with amputations. Orthopaedic Nursing 2004; 23(6): 397-402, 404-395. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006416-200411000-00010
17 Fragar L, Stain HJ, Perkins D, Kelly B, Fuller J, Coleman C, et al. Distress among rural residents: does employment and occupation make a difference? Australian Journal of Rural Health 2010; 18(1): 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2009.01119.x PMid:20136811
18 Lin K-H, Liao S-C, Guo N-W, Kuo C-Y, Hu P-Y, Hsu J-H, et al. The impact of psychological symptoms on return-to-work in injured workers after occupational injury. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2011; 68(1): 98. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2011-100382.322
19 Inder KJ, Holliday EG, Handley TE, Fragar LJ, Lower T, Booth A, et al. Depression and risk of unintentional injury in rural communities – a longitudinal analysis of the Australian Rural Mental Health Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health; 2017(14): 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14091080 PMid:28926999
20 Beattie J, McLeod C, Murray M, Pedler D, Brumby S, Gabbe B. What happens to the farm? Australian farmers’ experiences after a serious farm injury. Journal of Agromedicine 2018; 23(2): 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2017.1422836 PMid:29648954
21 Cameron PA, Finch CF, Gabbe BJ, Collins LJ, Smith KL, McNeil JJ. Developing Australia’s first statewide trauma registry: what are the lessons? ANZ Journal of Surgery 2004; 74(6): 424-428. PMid:15191472
22 Green J, Thorgood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 2nd Edn. London: Sage Publications, 2009.
23 Sayers MR, Miller KM. Help-seeking behaviours of suicidal men aged 17–35 years: a consumer consultation and participation pilot project. Perth: Ministerial Council for Suicide Prevention, 2004.
24 Victorian Farmers Federation. Look over the farm gate. 2015. Available: https://lookoverthefarmgate.org.au (Accessed 20 January 2019).
25 Fenner P. Returning to work after an injury. Australian Family Physician 2013; 42: 182-185.
26 Kendrick D, Kelllezi B, Coupland C, Maula A, Beckett K, Morriss R, et al. Psychological morbidity and health-related quality of life after injury: multicentre cohort study. Quality of Life Research 2007; 26(5): 1233-1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1439-7 PMid:27785608
27 Gerbic RL. Striking a chord: how music and mantras influence resilience following a spinal cord injury. Doctoral dissertation. Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Transpersonal Psychology, 2013.
28 Brumby S. Rural directions for a better state of health. In: S Brumby, B Wilson, S Willder (Eds). Living longer on the land – sustainable farm families in broadacre agriculture. Canberra, ACT: Rural Industries Research Development Corporation, 2008; 6.
29 Leung F-H, Savithiri R. Spotlight on focus groups. Canadian Family Physician 2009; 55(2): 218-219.