Review Article

Primary health care in the Amazon and its potential impact on health inequities: a scoping review

AUTHORS

name here
Amandia Sousa1
PhD Candidate, Public Health Researcher *

name here
Fernando J Herkrath2
PhD, Public Health Researcher

name here
Carolyn Wallace3
PhD, General Manager

name here
Jane Farmer4
PhD, Director

name here
Aylene Bousquat5
PhD, Professor

CORRESPONDENCE

*Ms Amandia Sousa

AFFILIATIONS

1 Institute Leônidas e Maria Deane, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rua Terezina, 476 - Adrianópolis, Manaus, Amazonas 69058278, Brazil; and Politics, Management and Health Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246904, Brazil

2 Institute Leônidas e Maria Deane, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Rua Terezina, 476 - Adrianópolis, Manaus, Amazonas 69058278, Brazil

3 Merri Health, Pentridge Boulevard, Coburg, Vic. 3058, Australia

4 Social Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, Vic. 3122, Australia

5 Politics, Management and Health Department, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246904, Brazil

PUBLISHED

1 January 2022 Volume 22 Issue 1

HISTORY

RECEIVED: 16 March 2021

REVISED: 13 September 2021

ACCEPTED: 16 September 2021

CITATION

Sousa A, Herkrath FJ, Wallace C, Farmer J, Bousquat A.  Primary health care in the Amazon and its potential impact on health inequities: a scoping review. Rural and Remote Health 2022; 22: 6747. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH6747

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSgo to url

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence


abstract:

Introduction:  Health studies of the Amazon often focus on diseases and infections prevalent in the region, and few studies address health organizations and services. In this sense, this study fills a gap by reviewing the studies aimed at primary healthcare (PHC) implementation in the nine Amazonian countries. This review addresses a need to explore the forms in which PHC is implemented in the Amazon areas outside the urban centers and its potential to reduce health inequities. This study contributes to improvements in the practices of managers and health professionals and research on the topic.
Methods:  Scoping review methodology was applied to peer-reviewed articles. The databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Lilacs, Embase and Web of Science. Selected studies included peer-reviewed publications, published between January 2000 and November 2019, that focused on PHC or one of its components in the Amazon, and were published in English, Spanish and Portuguese. The study used Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review guidelines, supported by Levac, and included five steps: (i) identification phase, where search queries were applied to the databases followed by the removal of duplicates; (ii) screening phase, where titles and abstracts of articles were screened to exclude irrelevant articles; (iii) eligibility phase, where the full texts of articles were read to assess their relevancy to this study; (iv) data extraction, using a spreadsheet designed to capture relevant information required in this review, using an iterative process; (v) summarizing and classification of each article according to content. The second and third phases were conducted independently by two reviewers. If a disagreement arose between the reviewers, a third reviewer was consulted to help decide whether to include or exclude a study.
Results:  This review included 25 studies. Of these, 11 presented promising results regarding PHC functioning in the Amazon region, and 14 presented challenges and difficulties in its functioning. Some PHC strategies implemented in the Amazon showed the potential to reduce inequities, mostly when they involved actions that increased access to PHC in the region when they developed a culturally adapted role and engaged community members in the decision-making and in the collaborative construction of health services. Actions that exposed challenges and difficulties were related to ill-prepared healthcare professionals, inadequate service approach and the inability to adapt to cultural issues.
Conclusion:  The findings reveal information about PHC implementations that have had promising results in the Amazon region and, at the same time, show the challenges and difficulties of the PHC actions. The findings also highlight and synthesize knowledge about the potential that PHC strategies have to affect existing inequities in the Amazon region and gaps in the studies that have been undertaken, or at least published, including a lack of studies of PHC implementation and examination of strategies aimed at health determinants.

Keywords:

Amazon region, health equity, health services research, primary health care, public health, rural health services.

full article:

Introduction

Most of the Amazon region population living outside urban areas and big cities is subject to precarious living and health conditions. These circumstances result from how these people have been exploited over time, which generally demonstrate a disregard for their interests1. Investments have been made in the Amazon region to expand large-scale livestock, soy production and extractive activities, such as logging, mining, oil and gas exploration and construction of hydroelectric plants, but, in general, these actions operate in an exploratory logic that, in addition to being harmful to the environment, violate local communities’ rights2.

The areas of environmental degradation ‘coincide’ with social degradation areas, which further exposes people to vulnerable situations and, consequently, health risks3. The literature cites access to potable water, lack of basic sanitation, infectious diseases, exposure to toxic products, and high nutrition-related disease rates as common problems in this region4-8.

These conditions are aggravated by the Amazon being marginalized by domestic policies of Amazonian countries, which exclude the region from national plans and dynamics9. This situation contrasts with the importance of the Amazon on the global stage because it accounts for 56% of the world’s rainforest and 20% of its freshwater flow.

The Amazon is in South America, covering an area of 6 million km2 in nine countries. Its coverage is distributed in those countries as follows: Brazil (58.4%), Peru (12.8%), Bolivia (7.7%), Colombia (7.1%), Venezuela (6.1%), Guyana (3.1%), Suriname (2.5%), French Guiana (1.4%), and Ecuador (1%)10. It is characterized as a biome predominantly composed of forest located in the Amazon River’s hydrographic basin. Despite that, the Amazon is not homogeneous but consists of different areas that result from the interaction of its physical aspects with the population diversity that inhabited this region at different times in history11.

The literature shows how parts of the region gained importance because of the natural resources to be explored12. This resulted in the occupation of the territory, which has contributed to the formation of large urban centers and places where a greater financial and political capital is concentrated in relation to most of the region, which consists of a mosaic of farms, villages, isolated houses and small towns spread over a vast territory, often accessible only by river, and that can be considered remote because of the difficult access. As a rule, these places are inhabited by Indigenous peoples. These peoples include a wide variety of groups, who, depending on where and how they live, are known as ‘villagers’, ‘mestizos’, ‘river people’ or ‘caboclas13.

The historical development of this region and the transformations that it has undergone, also marked by inequalities in the distribution of power, prestige, and resources, has contributed to the presence of health inequities in the region, which can be observed in the lack of resources and public policies, including health policies, in areas outside the urban centers or that are not being economically explored. This reality has contributed to the limited access to health services, especially high-complexity services, that are usually offered in larger cities14,15.

In most South American countries, primary health care (PHC) has been strongly influenced by selective PHC models. In those countries, the vertical health programs focusing on specific diseases and not on the global needs of users were common between the 1980s and 1990s16. One result of this process in health policy was to increase privatized services and adopt a market-oriented approach with minimal economic interventions targeted at specific groups17. These policies have led to a general lack of support for a more comprehensive PHC model and have increased social inequities18. It was common for the poorest and rural populations to be harmed in this model19.

However, in the first decade of the 21st century, several countries in South America experienced processes of renewal of PHC that have sought once again to adopt a comprehensive PHC approach that is closer to the Alma-Ata2 concept. Countries such as Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela began to adopt new PHC models that have common features: a family approach, comprehensive care, and a community approach with multidisciplinary teams in specific territories with specific populations. 

A study focusing on PHC in South American countries has reported effective results in the performance of PHC related to improving health conditions, but challenges and problems in its implementation process were also pointed out20. Giovanella et al highlight the challenges of reaching remote and disadvantaged areas in South America18.

In the Amazon, some studies have reported disorganized distribution of healthcare services and the lack of PHC services14,21, and findings showed that those most excluded from services in Amazon are mainly vulnerable and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations22.

The absence and difficulties of PHC performance in the Amazon causes concern because studies have found improvements in health indicators associated with the implementation of PHC23. Furthermore, in rural and remote areas, care recommended by PHC has been considered strategic to meet the needs of these territories24. Its relevance in these locations is emphasized, given its importance for reducing morbidity and mortality25. PHC is also considered ideal when caring for traditional populations in rural and remote areas26.

Given the relevance of PHC in the Amazon and the difficulties of health policies to prove effective when facing this context27, the aim of this review was to map the studies in the literature that have addressed these issues, identify the ways in which PHC is implemented, analyze its potential to reduce health inequities in locations outside urban areas in the Amazon, and identify gaps that can guide future research and help plan service improvements in this region.

Methods

Because of the complexity of the issue and that it has not been reviewed previously to any extent, this study adopted a scoping review methodology. By using the protocol proposed by Arksey and O’Malley28, the main concepts of the area of study were mapped, and existing gaps in evidence were identified. The understanding gained from the mapped studies was then synthesized in accordance with the method described by Levac et al29.

In view of the study objectives, this review proposed the following question: ‘How does PHC function and what are its strategies in the Amazon and their respective potential to reduce inequities?’. In this study, the concept of PHC followed the approach defended by Vuori30, which presents at least four ways of understanding PHC: as a set of activities, as a level of care, as a strategy of organization for the service system, and as a principle that should guide all the actions developed in a health system. The search keywords were identified, considering these statements.

The search keywords (Table 1) were identified through consultations between the researchers and a health science librarian and a scan of the titles and subject headings from the results of the preliminary search. All the studies in the databases were limited to the languages spoken by the team members (English, Portuguese and Spanish) and a publication date between January 2000 and November 2019.

For this review, especially as it focuses on a specific ecosystem in which the territorial characteristics are not limited to commonly held ideas about rural life, the decision was made not to use the term ‘rural’ as a search criterion, but instead use the term ‘Amazon’, opting to include the studies about PHC in the Amazon provided they were not limited to the urban areas in this region.

The databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Lilacs, Embase and Web of Science between June 2019 and November 2019. The bibliographic information for each search result was imported into Covidence (http://www.covidence.org). Subsequently, duplicate articles were removed and the abstracts were reviewed.

The titles and information on the abstracts in these records were reviewed independently by two researchers; studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria or any of the established exclusion criteria were excluded (Table 2). Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Where there was disagreement about eligibility, one of the authors who had not participated in the first phase of the review gave their opinion, and then the other authors reread the item, and the final decision on inclusion was made in a group meeting. Studies were not excluded on quality grounds but purposely included to map available evidence as consistent with the scoping review methodology.

After that, three authors read the complete articles and reviewed them independently. During this process, the reference lists of included studies were also evaluated, resulting in the selection of no additional studies. The authors created a spreadsheet model with predefined codes that was shared among reviewers for data extraction. During data charting, some codes were adjusted, and other codes were added to the spreadsheet. That resulted in the following information being collected for each article: author, year of study, objective, country, method, how rural is described, PHC strategy/actions, positive impacts, and negative impacts. Then, each article was summarized and classified according to content.

This process enabled visualization of the scope and discussion among the team, resolving any disagreements about content allocation. Following this, content analysis was performed in accordance with the theoretical reference used.

Table 1:  Keywords for electronic database search 2020table image

Table 2:  Inclusion/exclusion criteria for scoping review paperstable image

Ethics approval

Because this work was a literature review and relied on secondary materials, it did not require ethical review.

Results

The database search returned 817 results. Following the removal of duplicate articles, 378 unique records remained for possible inclusion in the review. Those papers abstracts were then read, leaving 81 studies for the researchers to read in their entirety and independently, after which 25 studies were included (Fig1). Table 3 shows the main characteristics of each included study.

table image Figure 1:  Flow diagram for the scoping review process.

Table 3:  Data extraction sheet31-55table imagetable imagetable imagetable image

Study locations

Of the articles included, the majority originated in Brazil31-50, followed by Ecuador51,52, Venezuela53, Suriname54, and Peru55. As well as registering the country where the PHC services took place, this review prioritized how the authors referred to the study location. This characterization was important because of the different landscapes and population groups of the Amazon. Most authors referred to the study location as ‘small municipalities’ (n=9). Other terms used by authors to designate the place were ‘Indigenous areas’ (n=7), ‘rural/remote’ (n=3), and the ‘region of the country’ where the study took place (n=2); while other authors used characteristics to describe the place as a ‘várzea region’ (floodplain) (n=2). One of the studies that also referred to riverbank areas gave more emphasis to the aspects of the population groups that inhabited the place, referring to it as a ‘fishing community’ (n=1) and one of the studies referred to the place as ‘interior’ (n=1).

Implementation of actions and strategies adopted by primary health care

Of the 25 studies, 11 of them31,32,43-48,51,54,55 revealed promising results regarding PHC implementation and strategies. On the other hand, 14 studies presented results that highlight difficulties and challenges to be overcome33-42,49,50,52,53.

Impacts on access

Based on the PHC actions implemented and their respective results in the studies (Table 3), six studies suggest that the implemented actions successfully broadened access. These actions include:

  • use of technology to support and supervise community health workers (CHWs) and nursing technicians51,54,55 that helped provide services in isolated areas that do not have other health professionals
  • measures taken by policies and management to organize and adapt the services and retain medical professionals in remote areas44,45,51 that increased the number of medical attention and the demand for care
  • performance of a new health unit model that operates aboard a boat46, which included people previously excluded from health services and increased the number of people with health assistance.

However, in two studies, the PHC actions and results indicate a possible increased difficulty in access to services. One of them41 analyzed the access and coverage in urban, rural and remote areas. This study revealed services concentrated in urban areas, and their design did not consider the vast distances, population dispersion, and financial expenditure imposed on users. Another study42, which focused on the context and degree of implementation of the Tuberculosis Control Program in PHC services, found that the actions were restricted to the municipality’s urban area and revealed no planning, goals, or strategies to the rural area, despite presenting disease cases.

Impacts on quality

Twelve studies pointed out implemented actions and results that showed flaws in the quality of services. These findings appeared in studies that investigated PHC services. Four studies focused on actions and strategies related to the approach used by the services 33,36,37,50 and presented the work with individual care, focused on the disease and did not consider the reality of families and the sociocultural context. Three studies were dedicated to the performance of professionals considering their previous academic education and training34,35,53 and found professionals poorly prepared to work in the PHC services and contradictions between what is expected and what is done by professionals in the services. Four studies described the service management34,38-40 and found problems in supervising, monitoring actions and managing professionals’ relationships. Two studies investigated whether the services were working with a cultural approach49,52 and found that the health professionals did not consider the traditional knowledge in their performance.

Nine studies presented results that suggest positive impacts on the quality of services. Five of them referred to training or other strategies used to prepare the professionals32,44,48,51,54, which resulted in qualified professionals to work. One of the studies dedicated to monitoring the activities and support to the professionals44 showed how these actions can contribute to improving the quality of care and the use of financial resources. Four studies were addressed to investigated the adoption of culturally appropriate approaches by services31,43,47,54 and found facilitated ties with the community. One of the studies focused on the approach of implementing an STD/AIDS program in an Indigenous community and described the use of participatory methodology43 that avoiding a possible resistance to the program.

Impacts on community empowerment

Engaging community members in the construction of and decision-making for PHC actions appeared in one study47 that showed the participation of Indigenous health agents in both local health groups and regional health groups.

Discussion

The findings of this review revealed that few studies have focused on PHC in the Amazon. However, another problem was identified: the unequal distribution of these studies. As this review shows, most studies were conducted in Brazil, and few studies were conducted in other Amazonian countries. No studies were found in Bolivia, Colombia, Guyana, or French Guiana. Despite the difficulty of research in countries with low income, it is in these countries that research in PHC is the most necessary56. Notably, the diversity of terms used by authors of the studies to refer to the location reveals that there is no single way of referring to places in the Amazon outside the urban centers.

The studies found in the review, in general, focused on the functioning of free-of-charge public health units, projects and actions in rural areas of the Amazon. The actions and strategies addressed by the studies were part of the list of daily activities in these units. Some studies described projects developed in these units by policies especially established for rural or Amazonian areas. It is noteworthy that some actions and strategies were carried out by various actors, including non-profit organizations, foundations and programs developed by universities.

Most studies were conducted in healthcare units that are part of the Brazilian program Family Health Strategy. The Family Health Strategy was implemented in Brazil in 2006 and is the main primary care initiative in the country. These healthcare units follow the same healthcare model all over the country, with no differences between urban and rural areas, serving as a gateway to the entire health system. The teams of health professionals (general practitioner, one nurse, one or two nursing technicians and four to six community agents) are placed in strategic geographical locations57.

In countries other than Brazil, the health units portrayed have a specific operation model in rural areas, grouped into health posts and health units. Health posts are typically located in isolated areas and composed of CHWs or nurse practitioners, who are usually assisted by doctors from health units. Health units are located in a provincial or district capital and are made up of doctors and nurses. A common feature of the health posts is that they are located over scattered areas and serve a smaller number of people18.

The actions and strategies of PHC, as well as the results, reveal that most of the PHC implementations face difficulties and challenges. Nevertheless, some studies reported promising results and suggested that the strategies of PHC were effective in the Amazon region.

It is important to recognize the actions that have contributed to a better performance of PHC, as well as the strategies and actions that still present problems, both for the relevance that the PHC has in improving people’s health conditions58 and for its role concerning health inequalities, since it is considered the most effective model in reducing health differences in society and in promoting equity59. To achieve this result, the PHC must meet the following requirements: the PHC team should be highly accessible, and focus on high-quality and networked operations with other sectors to increase social cohesion and empowerment60.

Previous studies have shown that improvement in access, in Latin American countries, results in better health conditions. For example, a study conducted in rural areas of Bolivia reported that mortality rates were four times lower in areas assisted by PHC than in areas that did not receive assistance61. Confirming those studies, the results of this review also showed positive impacts on rural Amazonian areas due to an improvement in access. Also, this review showed that the total number of PHC actions in the Amazon that had a positive impact on access was higher than those that had a negative impact.

Among these results, one of the studies demonstrated the importance of using radio and cell phones, making it possible for more educated professionals to support CHWs and nursing practitioners in isolated locations where they must work alone. It also slightly reduced the feelings of professional isolation of part of rural healthcare personnel. One of the studies suggested that health units using this strategy reduced the morbidity and mortality rate in a remote community in the Amazon region. That is particularly relevant in Amazonian countries where rural health units are composed of only CHWs or nursing practitioners, and communication is difficult because of their isolation. In this regard, there is a recognized impact of the presence of these workers on communities in disadvantageous conditions in Latin America62, where they are considered a link between rural community members and other providers of health services63.

However, some actions have demonstrated the potential to negatively affect access. These were related to how services are geographically arranged and how they are provided in rural areas, which in some cases accentuate differences between places, potentially increasing inequities. For example, one study presented the imbalance in the distribution of services between urban and rural areas in the Amazon, and another showed problems in retaining the workforce. These are everyday situations in rural Amazon and demand action from managers to overcome these differences. One example is the imbalance in the number of doctors available in urban and rural areas in the Brazilian Amazon, which needs policies and management measures to be overcome64.

Although the number of studies with negative results regarding access was lower than the positive, the number of actions with negative results regarding quality was higher. The findings of this review demonstrate that the quality of services remains a challenge for PHC in the Amazon. Findings in this area reveal problems related to the cultural adaptation of services, inadequate approaches, poor preparation of the workforce and problems in service management. Among the negative impacts on the quality of the services, the most recurrent results are related to the use of a biomedical approach by health professionals and problems in the management of services.

Despite the effort to adopt a comprehensive healthcare approach by health policies in the South American countries, this review shows the use of a biomedical approach rather than a ‘whole-patient oriented’ one65. This can be explained by the strong market-oriented influence in these countries66. However, Starfield67 states that a health system focused on subspecialization threatens equity goals because subspecialty care is too expensive, and countries cannot afford the cost of distributing this type of service to everyone.

Another issue that was most often related to negative impacts on the quality of PHC services was limitations in manager performance. Management performance plays a key role in conducting PHC services in rural areas. Studies that showed these results presented difficulties for managers in carrying out inspections, monitoring the results of services, supporting professionals and implementing services68.

Some of the actions described in the studies demonstrated improved service quality. These studies were often related to the education and training of professionals, the most frequently cited being CHW training. The studies suggest that when CHWs are trained, they become important allies for the quality of services in Amazonian areas. These results have also been found in prior studies, which highlights the importance of these professionals in rural and remote areas69. However, problems in the preparation of CHWs to work in PHC showed they could put the populations they serve at risk; for example, by distributing medicines without proper guidance. This review also indicates that the higher-level professionals had a deficit in their training, according to their actions and the results of the studies, evidencing contradictions between what is recommended and the work execution in Amazon.

The culturally appropriate approach was considered the most important characteristic of the PHC services in the study with Indigenous people26, but some studies in the review still presented negative results in this regard. Not paying attention to or not adapting the services to cultural differences tends to unbalance the power between the population and health professionals in rural areas. According to Malatzky70, the power relations that unroll in rural and remote settings must be carefully considered because of the prevalent understanding of the fragilities of such settings, with healthcare actions often reproducing and reinforcing that type of relation.

Despite health policies in Latin America adopting strategies that have shown good results by engaging people to control and participate in the development of health services71, only one study described the engagement of people as a strategy used by the PHC services in Amazon. The lack of studies with similar orientation is a challenge for the PHC services in these areas, since community engagement has been recognized as one way to offer quality and sustainable PHC actions in remote areas72.

Also of note in the findings is the gap in PHC actions that involved external partnerships in their implementation, which is understood to be essential for a less fragmented PHC that responds better to the inequities. This review also identified in PHC actions a lack of strategies aimed at modifying health determinants, which in this region primarily involve social and environmental issues. It is also of note that this review did not find evidence of any PHC strategies that demonstrated, prior to the service implementation, a concern with the impacts on inequities, a strategy that Freeman et al73 identified as significant when implementing PHC services.

Strengths and limitations

This scoping review is the first attempt to comprehensively synthesize and describe the published literature on PHC in the Amazon. A second strength is that the review included studies in Portuguese, Spanish, and English, which broadened the scope of the research to provide significant coverage of the available literature.

One of the limitations of this review is that it focuses only on peer-reviewed articles and probably did not include valuable documents from the grey literature. Also, since none of the included studies reported the effectiveness of their interventions or measured the impact on inequities, the analyses were based on the results presented by the authors about the general aspects of the PHC in the Amazon and interpretations about what has been exposed by the literature about this topic to reach the conclusions presented here.

Conclusion

As an initial study exploring the existing literature about PHC in the Amazon, this review has produced useful findings. It has exposed forms of PHC implementation that appear to have promising results, indicating the paths to be followed by public health policies, health managers and professionals in the Amazon region.

The results highlight the benefits of actions that expanded access to PHC given their ability to adapt to the singularities of the place, such as the policies for the provision of professionals in remote areas, the strategies used by managers to retain professionals in the Amazon and the health unit model adapted to the river. These results reinforce the need to recognize, given the heterogeneity of this region, that one-size-fits-all policies are insufficient and specific solutions are required that respect the singularities of the place.

Investment in training and the use of technologies by CHWs have shown promise in the region. However, there are still uncertainties and insufficient knowledge about the ideal performance of this professional group. The Indigenous health agents are workers specific to the Amazon region. As found in the review, they can mediate traditional and biomedical knowledge, providing a less unequal power relationship between professionals and Indigenous people. However, both the CHWs and the Indigenous health agents need to be recognized by public policies. Research that addresses their performance can help outline the possible roles they can play according to the needs and singularities of each place.

The difficulties and challenges reveal that, despite the efforts of some Latin American countries to adopt comprehensive approaches in the training of professionals in academic courses, it is still necessary to strengthen public policies in this direction and prepare professionals to work in Amazonian areas. It must include training in approaches that promote the openness of these professionals to provide care that is culturally appropriate, comprehensive, holistic and accessible. Further to this, qualified managers are required to support and supervise the professionals.

The review exposed gaps in the research that has been undertaken or at least published, including a lack of studies of strategies aimed at health determinants. There was also a lack of evidence of work involving community engagement and partnerships developed with other actors in the community. In this sense, there is an urgent demand for research and policies to prioritize these themes since they are fundamental strategies in the face of the threats to the health of people living in the Amazon.

Acknowledgements

This study has been supported by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil, and the Foundation for Research Support of the State of the Amazon PPSUS/01/2017 EFP_00014168, Brazil. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

references:

1 Fraxe T de JP, Wilkoski AC, Miguez SF. The being of the Amazon: identity and invisibility. [In Portuguese]. Ciência e Cultura 2009; 61(3): 30-32. Available: web link (Accessed 14 September 2020).
2 Bebbington DH, Verdum R, Gamboa C, Bebbington AJ. Impacts of extractive industry and infrastructure on forests: Amazonia. 2018. Available: web link (Accessed 13 September 2020).
3 Torres HG. The demographics of environmental risk. [In Portuguese]. In: HG Torres, He Costa (Eds). População e meio ambiente: debates e desafios. São Paulo: Senac, 2000; 53-73.
4 Joseph SA, Casapía M, Blouin B, Maheu-Giroux M, Rahme E, Gyorkos TW. Risk factors associated with malnutrition in one-year-old children living in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2014. DOI link, PMid:25503381
5 Brondizio ES. The elephant in the room: Amazonian cities deserve more attention in climate change and sustainability discussions. Vulnerabilidade 2016; 5(April): 15-25. Available: web link (Accessed 20 July 2020).
6 Westgard CM, Rogers A, Bello G, Rivadeneyra N. Health service utilization, perspectives, and health-seeking behavior for maternal and child health services in the Amazon of Peru, a mixed-methods study. International Journal for Equity in Health 2019; 18(1): 155. Available: web link (Accessed 11 December 2020). DOI link, PMid:31615516
7 Ferreira da Silva S, de Oliveira Lima M. Mercury in fish marketed in the Amazon Triple Frontier and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 2020; 248: 125989. Available: web link (Accessed 24 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:32007773
8 Cunha M, Marques R, Dórea J. Child nutritional status in the changing socioeconomic region of the northern Amazon, Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2017; 15(1): 15. Available: web link (Accessed 24 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:29295489
9 Porto-Gonçalves CW. Amazon, Amazons. Current territorial tensions. [In Spanish]. Nueva Sociedad 2017; 272: 150-158. Available: web link (Accessed 14 September 2020).
10 Coca-Castro A, Reymondin L, Bellfield H, Hyman G. Land use status and trends in Amazonia. A report for the Amazonia Security Agenda Project. Terra-i, 2013; 72. Available: web link (Accessed 16 August 2020).
11 Fraxe TJP. Caboclo/riverside culture: myth, legends and transculturality. [In Portuguese]. São Paulo: Annablume, 2004.
12 Santos M, Silveira ML. Brazil: territory and society at the beginning of the 21st century. [In Portuguese]. 8th edn. São Paulo: Record, 2008.
13 Lima D, Pozzobon J. Socio-environmental Amazon: ecological sustainability and social diversity. [In Portuguese]. Estudos Avançados 2005; 19(54): 45-76. Available: web link (Accessed 20 July 2020). DOI link
14 Garnelo L, Sousa ABL, Silva C de O da. Health regionalization in Amazonas: progress and challenges. [In Spanish]. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 2017; 22(4): 1225-1234. Available: web link (Accessed 30 November 2017). DOI link, PMid:28444047
15 Garnelo L. Specificities and challenges of public health policies in the Brazilian Amazon. [In Portuguese]. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2019; 35(12): e00220519. Available: web link (Accessed 20 July 2020).
16 Acosta Ramírez N, Giovanella L, Vega Romero R, Tejerina Silva H, de Almeida PF, Ríos G, et al. Mapping primary health care renewal in South America. Family Practice 2016; 33(3): 261-267. Available: web link (Accessed 28 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:27006410
17 Laurell AC. The logic of privatization in health. [In Spanish]. In: C Eibenschutz (Ed.). Health policy: public and private. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 1995; 31-48.
18 Giovanella L, Almeida PF de, Vega Romero R, Oliveira S, Tejerina Silva H. Overview of primary health care in South America: conceptions, components and challenges. [In Portuguese]. Saúde em Debate 2015; 39(105): 300-322. Available: web link (Accessed 28 August 2021). DOI link
19 Frenk J. Primary care and reform of health systems: a framework for the analysis of Latin American experiences. Health Services Management Research 1992; 5(1): 32-43. Available: web link (Accessed 29 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:10118440
20 Ramírez NA, Ruiz JP, Romero RV, Labonté R. Comprehensive primary health care in South America: contexts, achievements and policy implications. [In Portuguese]. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2011; 27(10): 1875-1890. Available: web link (Accessed 30 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:22031193
21 Garnelo L, Lucas AC dos S, Parente RCP, Rocha ESC, Gonçalves MJF. Organization of health care for chronic conditions by family health teams in the Amazon. [In Portuguese]. Saúde em Debate 2014; 38(special): 158-172. Available: web link (Accessed 1 October 2016). DOI link
22 Galvao TF, Tiguman GMB, Caicedo Roa M, Silva MT. Inequity in utilizing health services in the Brazilian Amazon: a population‐based survey, 2015. International Journal of Health Planning and Management 2019; 34(4): e1846-e1853. Available: web link (Accessed 15 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:31515900
23 Macinko J, Starfield B, Erinosho T. The impact of primary healthcare on population health in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 2009; 32(2): 150-171. Available: web link (Accessed 15 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:19305227
24 Thomas SL, Wakerman J, Humphreys JS. What core primary health care services should be available to Australians living in rural and remote communities? Family Practice 2014; 15(1): 143. Available: web link (Accessed 15 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:25143194
25 Zhao Y, Connors C, Lee AH, Liang W. Relationship between primary care visits and hospital admissions in remote indigenous patients with diabetes: a multivariate spline regression model. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2015; 108(1): 106-112. DOI link, PMid:25666107
26 Harfield SG, Davy C, McArthur A, Munn Z, Brown A, Brown N. Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models: a systematic scoping review. Globalization and Health 2018; 14(1): 12. Available: web link (Accessed 17 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:29368657
27 Viana AL d'Á, Machado CV, Baptista TW de F, de Lima LD, de Mendonça MHM, Heimann LS, et al. Universal health systems and territory: challenges for a regional policy in the Brazilian Legal Amazon. [In Portuguese]. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2007; 23: S117-S131. Available: web link (Accessed 30 September 2016). DOI link, PMid:17625640
28 Arksey H, Malley LO. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005; 8: 19-32. Available: web link (Accessed 7 April 2019). DOI link
29 Levac D, Colquhoun H, Brien KKO. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science 2010; 5: 69. Available: web link (Accessed 7 April 2019). DOI link, PMid:20854677
30 Vuori H. Health for all, primary health care and general practitioners. Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 1986; 36(290): 398-402. Available: web link (Accessed 7 April 2019).
31 Sousa F de J, de Andrade F do S, da Silva M do PSDC. The Amazon culture and its application in practices of education in health and nursing. [In Spanish]. Revista Cuidarte 2015; 6(2): 1103-1107. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
32 Paixão MP, Miot HA, de Souza PE, Haddad AE, Wen CL. A university extension course in leprosy: telemedicine in the Amazon for primary healthcare. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2009; 15(2): 64-67. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link, PMid:19246604
33 Moretti-Pires RO, Ferro SBG, Büchele F, de Oliveira HM, Gonçalves MJF. Family health nurse in the Amazon: concepts and management of themes regarding alcohol abuse. [In Portuguese]. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem 2011; 45(4): 926-932. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link, PMid:21876894
34 Faria IBR, Ventura JC, Silva DE, Moretti-Pires RO. The family health work process on the context of the interior of Amazon. [In Portuguese]. Cogitare Enfermagem 2010; 15(2): 17852. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link
35 Moretti-Pires RO, Lima LAM, Katsurayama M. The training of family health doctors in the interior of Amazon on the problematic of alcohol abuse. [In Portuguese]. Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde 2010; 23(1): 56-62. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link
36 Moretti-Pires RO, Campos DA de. Alcohol abuse and primary care in the Amazon: training nurses and physicians for comprehensive care. [In Portuguese]. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica 2010; 34(3): 379-389. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link
37 Moretti-Pires RO. Moretti-Pires RO. [In Portuguese]. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica 2009; 33(3): 428-436. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
38 Souza MLP de. Notes about the specificities in the academic supervision in indigenous area in 'Programa Mais Médico para o Brasil': the case of the state of Amazon. [In Portuguese]. Tempus Actas de Saúde Coletiva 2015; 9(4): 191. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
39 Katsurayama M, Parente RCP, Moretti-Pires RO. The worker in the family health program in the state of Amazonas: a qualitative study. [In Portuguese]. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde 2016; 14: 183-198. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link
40 Pioner LM. Precarious work and moral harassment among workers of Family Health Strategy. [In Portuguese]. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho 2012; 10(1): 19-26. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
41 Garnelo L, Lima JG, Rocha ESC, Herkrath FJ. Access and coverage of primary health care for rural and urban populations in the northern region of Brazil. [In Portuguese]. Saúde em Debate 2018; 42(s1): 81-99. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link
42 Heufemann NEC, Gonçalves MJF, Garnelo ML. Evaluation of a tuberculosis control program in an Amazonian scenario: challenges in Coari. [In Portuguese]. Acta Amazonica 2013; 43(1): 33-42. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
43 Garnelo L, Araújo I, Silva RM, Benzaken A, Dias LC, Encarnação A, et al. STD/AIDS control among indigenous areas: the symbolic market of Upper Rio Negro. [In Portuguese]. Jornal Brasileiro de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis 2001; 13: 23-26. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
44 Kitajima A, Moreira MA. Organizational health process in the municipality of Borba (AM): daring to make the Amazon. [In Portuguese]. Divulgação em Saúde para Debate 2012; 48: 73-81. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
45 Pereira LL, Pacheco L. The challenges faced by the More Doctors Program in providing and ensuring comprehensive health care in rural areas in the Amazon region, Brazil. Interface: Communication, Health, Education 2017; 21: 1181-1192. Available: web link (Accessed 14 November 2019).
46 Kadri MR El, Santos BS dos, Lima RT de S, Schweickardt JC, Martins FM. Floating Primary Health Center: a new approach to primary care in the Amazon, Brazil. Interface - Communication, Health, Education 2019; 23: 1-14. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
47 Scopel D, Dias-Scopel RP, Langdon EJ. Intermedicality and protagonism: the role of indigenous health agents on the Kwatá-Laranjal Indian Reservation in Amazonas State, Brazil. [In Portuguese]. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2015; 31(12): 2559-2568. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link, PMid:26872232
48 Kawasaki R, Sadamori T, Ferreira de Almeida T, Akiyoshi M, Nishihara M, Yoshimura T, et al. Reactions of community members regarding community health workers activities as a measure of the impact of a training program in Amazonas, Brazil. Journal of Rural Medicine 2015; 10(1): 7-19. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link, PMid:26380586
49 Neto GBC, Germano JW, Furtado LG. Dialogue between traditional knowledge and medical science on a traditional fishermen community in the coastline of the Amazon. Coleciona SUS 2016. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
50 Moretti-Pires RO, Corradi-Webster CM, Furtado EF. Alcohol abuse and primary care in the Amazon: training nurses and physicians for comprehensive care. [In Portuguese]. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica 2011; 35(2): 219-228. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link
51 Vacas FJ, Gonzalez M, Sanabria V, Madera A. Management of environmental, social and health issues involving indigenous communities at the Villano project in the Ecuadorian Amazon region. SPE Production and Facilities 2003; 18(2): 92-96. DOI link
52 Pulido Fuentes M. An effective medicine between cultures? The experience of a health program of primary care in indigenous communities from the Amazonian Ecuatorean Jungle. Index de Enfermería 2010; 19(2-3): 208-212. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
53 Barraza Díaz E, Sánchez SG. Rational drug use by community workers in primary health care in the rural clinics of the municipality Atures, Amazonas State (Venezuela), year 2011. [In Spanish]. Revista del Instituto Nacional de Higiene Rafael Rangel 2014; 45(2): 79-95. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019).
54 Eersel MGM, Vreden SGS, van Eer ED, Mans DRA. Fifty years of primary health care in the rainforest: temporal trends in morbidity and mortality in indigenous Amerindian populations of Suriname. Journal of Global Health 2018; 8(2): 20403. DOI link, PMid:30237875
55 Martínez A, Villarroel V, Seoane J, Del Pozo F. A study of a rural telemedicine system in the Amazon region of Peru. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2004; 10(4): 219-225. Available: web link (Accessed 14 July 2019). DOI link, PMid:15273032
56 Beasley JW, Starfield B, van Weel C, Rosser WW, Haq CL. Global health and primary care research. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 2007; 20(6): 518-526. Available: web link (Accessed 18 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:17954858
57 Pinto LF, Giovanella L. The family health strategy: expanding access and reducing hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 2018; 23(6): 1903-1913. DOI link, PMid:29972498
58 Starfield B, Shi L, Grover A, Macinko J. The effects of specialist supply on populations' health: assessing the evidence. Health Affairs 2005; 24(S1): W5-97-W5-107. Available: web link (Accessed 19 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:15769797
59 Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. The Milbank Quarterly 2005; 83(3): 457-502. Available: web link (Accessed 19 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:16202000
60 De Maeseneer J, Willems S, De Sutter A, Van de Geuchte I, Billings M. Primary health care as a strategy for achieving equitable care: a literature review commissioned by the Health Systems Knowledge Network. March 2007. Available: web link (Accessed 4 August 2020).
61 Perry HB, Shanklin DS, Schroeder DgG. Impact of a community-based comprehensive primary health care programme on infant and child mortality in Bolivia. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition 2003; 21(4): 383-395.
62 Kaselitz E, Rana GK, Heisler M. Public policies and interventions for diabetes in Latin America: a scoping review. Current Diabetes Reports 2017; 17(8): 65. Available: web link (Accessed 19 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:28721593
63 Vidal NL. Crossing boundaries for maternal health: a qualitative investigation into the role of community health workers as frontline providers of maternal care in the Peruvian Andes (PhD thesis). Edinburgh, Scotland, 2015. Available: web link (Accessed 16 September 2020).
64 Silveira RP, Pinheiro R. Understanding the need for doctors in innerstate Amazon - Brazil. [In Portuguese]. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica 2014; 38(4): 451-459. Available: web link (Accessed 21 August 2021). DOI link
65 Starfield B. The hidden inequity in health care. International Journal for Equity in Health 2011; 10(1): 15. Available: web link (Accessed 22 August 2021). DOI link, PMid:21507245
66 Gattini C, Ruiz P. Health in South America, 2012 Edition: Health Situation, Policies and Systems Overview. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2012. Available: web link (Accessed 14 September 2020).
67 Starfield B. Primary care: balance between health, services and technology needs. [In Portuguese]. Vol. 148. Brasília: UNESCO, 2002.
68 Campbell J, Dussault G, Buchan J, Pozo-Martin F, Guerra Arias M, Leone C, et al. A universal truth: no health without a workforce. Vol. 12. Forum Report, Third Global Forum on Human Resources for Health. Recife, Brazil; Feneva: Global Health Workforce Alliance and World Health Organization, 2013.
69 Javanparast S, Windle A, Freeman T, Baum F. Community health worker programs to improve healthcare access and equity: are they only relevant to low- and middle-income countries? International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2018; 7(10): 943-954. DOI link, PMid:30316247
70 Malatzky C, Bourke L. Different perspectives on the key challenges facing rural health: the challenges of power and knowledge. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2018; 26(6): 436-440. DOI link, PMid:29799142
71 Wallerstein N, Mendes R, Minkler M, Akerman M. Reclaiming the social in community movements: perspectives from the USA and Brazil/South America: 25 years after Ottawa. Health Promotion International 2011; 26(S2): ii226-ii236. DOI link, PMid:22080077
72 Reeve C, Humphreys J, Wakerman J, Carroll V, Carter M, O'Brien T, et al. Community participation in health service reform: the development of an innovative remote Aboriginal primary health-care service. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2015; 21(4): 409. DOI link, PMid:25629591
73 Freeman T, Baum F, Lawless A, Javanparast S, Jolley G, Labonté R, et al. Revisiting the ability of Australian primary healthcare services to respond to health inequity. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2016; 22(4): 332-338. Available: web link (Accessed 14 September 2020). DOI link, PMid:28442028