Feasibility of a physiotherapist-led behaviour change intervention to improve physical activity in people with rheumatoid arthritis

Part of Special Series: WONCA World Rural Health Conference Abstracts 2022go to url


name here
Norelee Kennedy1
Associate Professor Physiotherapy, Vice President Research *

name here
Louise Larkin2

name here
Sean McKenna3
Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist

name here
Tadhg Pyne4
Research Assistant

name here
Stephen Gallagher5

name here
Liam Glynn6
MD, Professor of General Practice

name here
Alexander Fraser7
Clinical Director

name here
Bente Esbensen8
Professor of Nursing


*Professor Norelee Kennedy


1, 2, 3, 4 School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

5 Department of Psychology, University of Limerick , Limerick, Ireland

6 School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

7 Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

8 Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark


10 January 2023 Volume 23 Issue 1


RECEIVED: 20 September 2022

ACCEPTED: 20 September 2022


Kennedy N, Larkin L, McKenna S, Pyne T, Gallagher S, Glynn L, Fraser A, Esbensen B.  Feasibility of a physiotherapist-led behaviour change intervention to improve physical activity in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Rural and Remote Health 2023; 23: 8103. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8103


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence

go to urlCited by

no pdf available, use your browser's print function to create one


Introduction: Physical activity (PA) interventions incorporating behaviour change (BC) theory are needed to improve PA levels in people with rheumatoid arthritis. A pilot feasibility study of a Physiotherapist-led Intervention to Promote PA in Rheumatoid Arthritis (PIPPRA) was undertaken to obtain estimates for recruitment rate, participant retention and protocol adherence.

Methods: Participants were recruited at University Hospital (UH) rheumatology clinics and randomly assigned to control group (physical activity information leaflet) or intervention group (four BC physiotherapy sessions in 8 weeks). Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria), aged 18+ years and classified as insufficiently physically active. Ethical approval was obtained from the UH research ethics committee. Participants were assessed at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1) and 24 weeks (T2). Descriptive statistics and t-tests were used to analyse the data with SPSS v22.

Results: 320 participants were approached about the study with n=183 (57%) eligible to participate and n=58 (55%) consented to participate (recruitment rate: 6.4 per month; refusal rate 59%). Due to the impact of COVID-19 on the study, n=25 (43%) participants completed the study (n=11 (44%) intervention and n=14 (56%) control). Of the 25, n=23 (92%) were female, mean age was 60 years (s.d. 11.5). Intervention group participants completed 100% of BC sessions 1 and 2, 88% completed session 3 and 81% completed session 4.

Discussion: The intervention to promote physical activity was feasible and safe and provides a framework for larger intervention studies. Based on these findings, a fully powered trial is recommended.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/8103 for the Version of Record.