Letter to the Editor

Ultrasonography in primary care

AUTHORS

name here
Dimitrios Athanasopoulos
1 MD, Family Physician *

name here
Dimitrios Manifavas
2 MD, Family Physician

CORRESPONDENCE

*Dr Dimitrios Athanasopoulos

AFFILIATIONS

1 Academic Primary Care Centre ‘Samariterhemmet’, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

2 Health Department, Hellenic Fire Service, Kato Kifissia, Greece

PUBLISHED

12 September 2025 Volume 25 Issue 3

HISTORY

RECEIVED: 13 April 2025

ACCEPTED: 22 August 2025

CITATION

Athanasopoulos D, Manifavas D.  Ultrasonography in primary care . Rural and Remote Health 2025; 25: 9931. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH9931

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSgo to url

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence


Dear Editor

The recent article on the introduction of ultrasound in family medicine training is very interesting. The authors highlight the role of structured training in ultrasound1.

In Greece, ultrasonography training for specialists in family medicine has been available since 2000. Nowadays, there are two centers where this training can be provided: the university radiology departments of both Patras and Ioannina. This training focuses only on abdominal ultrasound. The training is full time and daily and lasts 6 months, with the help of a trainer. During the training, a minimum number of examinations is required, which the trainees have to perform on their own2.

The authors have successfully completed this training and have been using ultrasound in daily clinical practice for the last 10 years, and we would like to share our experience. Undoubtedly, ultrasound is a great tool, but it is user-dependent3 like other tools in medicine, such as the stethoscope. Training never ends and daily use is required to maintain a high level of skill4. There are also some challenges that a family physician has to face:

  • Ultrasound examination can extend the examination time. An ultrasound examination takes time: 3–9 minutes for focused examinations5 and up to 12 minutes for extended examinations such as of the upper abdomen6. Additional time is needed for preparation (2.9 minutes) and documentation (3.6 minutes)6.
  • Patients in primary care are not as prepared as patients who will undergo an ultrasound examination in a hospital. An optimal abdominal ultrasound requires at least 6 hours of fasting7.
  • The quality of the ultrasound machines used in family medicine can present some differences in comparison with the modern machines used in hospitals8.
  • When a radiologist evaluates a lesion, the question for further evaluation is sent to the clinical doctor. In our case, we have to detect and decide at the same time.
  • There is a risk of performing unnecessary examinations, which may reveal harmless findings that may cause patients to suffer9.

For these reasons, there is a need for structured and continual ultrasound training in family medicine.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Dimitrios Athanasopoulos, MD, MSc, Family Physician, Academic Primary Care Centre ‘Samariterhemmet’, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Dimitrios Manifavas, MD, MSc, Family Physician, Health Department of the Hellenic Fire Service, Kato Kifissia, Greece

References

1 Aujoulat P, Fonseca J, Perraud G, Viala J, Le Reste JY, Chiron B. Introducing ultrasonography in family medicine training: a pilot evaluation. Rural and Remote Health 2025; 25(2): 9549. DOI link, PMid:40211729
2 Government of Greece. Presidential decree 228, Article 2. Government Gazette of the Hellenic Republic (ΦΕΚ 197/ ΠΔ 228/12-9-2000)
3 Pinto A, Pinto F, Faggian A, Rubini G, Caranci F, Macarini L, et al. Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography. Critical Ultrasound Journal 2013; 5(Suppl 1): S1. DOI link, PMid:23902656
4 World Health Organization. Training in diagnostic ultrasound: essentials, principles and standards. Report of a WHO study group. 1998. Available: web link (Accessed 9 September 2025).
5 Patrick DP, Bradley XG, Wolek C, Anderson B, Grady J, Herbst MK. Minutes matter: Time it takes to perform point-of-care ultrasound. AEM Education and Training 2003; 7(4): e10901. DOI link, PMid:37600853
6 Reuss J, Weiss H, Wanner T, Leser HG. Time requirements of medical and non-medical personnel for ultrasound studies. [In German]. Ultraschall in der Medizin 1998; 19(3): 126-129. DOI link, PMid:9744044
7 Sondh RS, Mankotia R. Reducing prolonged fasting for abdominal ultrasound scans. BMJ Open Quality 2023; 12(3): e002396. DOI link, PMid:37541691
8 Haider SJA, diFlorio-Alexander R, Lam DH, Cho JY, Sohn JH, Harris R. Prospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy between point-of-care and conventional ultrasound in a general diagnostic department: implications for resource-limited settings. Journal of Ultrasound Medicine 2017; 36(7): 1453-1460. DOI link, PMid:28339133
9 Andersen CA, Holden S, Vela J, Rathleff MS, Jensen MB. Point-of-care ultrasound in general practice: a systematic review. Annals of Family Medicine 2019; 17(1): 61-69. DOI link, PMid:30670398