Original Research

Environmental and economic drivers of persistent open defecation in rural Osun State, Nigeria

AUTHORS

name here
Ajoke FI Akindele
1 PhD, Senior Lecturer * ORCID logo

name here
Oluwaseun E Odipe
2 ORCID logo

name here
Akinrinade K Adeleke
3

name here
Paschal O Iniaghe
4 Senior Lecturer ORCID logo

AFFILIATIONS

1 Department of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Environmental Management and Toxicology Unit, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Ondo State, Nigeria

2 Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Ondo State, Nigeria

3 Centre of Data Science and Public Health Metrics, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Ondo State, Nigeria

4 Department of Chemistry, Federal University Otuoke, Otuoke, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

ACCEPTED: 4 September 2026


Early Abstract:

Introduction: Open defecation remains a major environmental health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, with Nigeria bearing one of the highest global burdens despite increasing access to improved water sources and widespread awareness of sanitation-related health risks in rural areas.  Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) emphasize behavioral change prompting families to build their own latrines using local materials. CLTS drives community mobilization to stop open defecation collectively; the widespread prevalence of the practice in rural areas reveals a significant gap between sanitation knowledge and actual practice. Furthermore, very few empirical studies integrate the roles of environmental constraints, household financial choices, and sanitation behavior gaps in under-resourced settings. This study addresses this gap by investigating the environmental and socioeconomic determinants of open defecation persistence through a baseline assessment conducted during CLTS in rural Osun State, Nigeria. 
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 200 respondents across four rural villages of Osun state between March and May 2023. Data on sanitation infrastructure, defecation practices, water access, hygiene behaviours, and household economic priorities were collected using semi-structured questionnaires. Associations were examined using chi-square tests, ANOVA, and multiple regression analyses.
Results: 91.5% of households practiced open defecation, with only 5.5% owning improved toilet facilities, despite 89.5% having access to improved water sources. A pronounced knowledge-practice gap was observed, with  51.5% of households practicing handwashing before meals still disposing of faeces in open spaces (χ²=36.4, p<0.01). Household income significantly influenced prioritization of mobile phone purchases over latrine construction (χ²=19.34, p=0.04), while education level correlated with toilet quality perceptions (χ²=41.36, p<0.01). Soil type significantly influenced flooding risk and latrine siting feasibility (χ²=8.51, p=0.004). Regression analysis revealed that household size, gender, and perceived importance of handwashing significantly predicted water storage expenditure (F=7.44, p<0.001, R²=0.188). 
Conclusion: This study shows that awareness campaigns alone cannot stop open defecation in rural Nigeria, as knowledge and water access cannot overcome the structural barriers of extreme poverty and environmental constraints. Therefore, securing a nationwide open defecation-free status by 2030 requires a paradigm shift beyond mere behavioral interventions. In rural settings, sustainable progress depends on integrating subsidized financing mechanisms, conducting environmental feasibility assessments, and embedding sanitation initiatives within national poverty reduction frameworks. This comprehensive approach is necessary because current non-subsidized CLTS approaches are insufficient for rural communities facing extreme resource constraints.
Keywords: community-led total sanitation (CLTS), environmental health, knowledge–practice gap, open defecation, rural Nigeria, sanitation infrastructure, socioeconomic determinants.