Original Research

Retaining graduates of non-metropolitan medical schools for practice in the local area: the importance of locally based postgraduate training pathways in Australia and Canada

AUTHORS

name here
Torres Woolley1
MPHTM, PhD, Evaluation Coordinator *

name here
John C Hogenbirk2
MSc, Associate Director and Senior Research Associate

name here
Roger Strasser3
AM, MBBS, Professor of Rural Health and Founding Dean Emeritus

AFFILIATIONS

1 College of Medicine & Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia

2 Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

3 Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada; and Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

ACCEPTED: 20 July 2020


early abstract:

Objective: Identify commonalities between one regionally-based medical school in Australia and one in Canada regarding the association between postgraduate training location and doctors’ practice location once fully qualified in a medical specialty.
Methods: Data were obtained via a cross-sectional survey of graduates of the James Cook University (JCU) medical school, Queensland, Australia, who had completed advanced training to become a specialist (a ‘Fellow’) in that field (response rate = 60%, 197 of 326). Medical education, postgraduate training, and practice data were obtained for 400 of 409 (98%) fully licensed doctors who completed undergraduate medical education or postgraduate training or both at the Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM), Ontario, Canada. Binary logistic regression used postgraduate training location to predict practise in the school’s service region (northern Australia or northern Ontario). Separate analyses were conducted for medical discipline groupings of general/family practitioner, general specialist, and sub-specialist (JCU only).
Results: For JCU graduates, significant associations were found between training in a northern Australian hospital at least once during postgraduate training and current (2018) northern Australian practice for all 3 discipline subgroups: family practitioner (p<0.001; prevalence odds ratio (POR) = 30.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7 – 135.0); general specialist (p=0.002; POR=30.3; 95% CI: 3.3 – 273.4); and sub-specialist (p=0.027; POR=6.5; 95% CI: 1.2 – 34.0). Overall, 38% (56/149) of JCU graduates who had completed a Fellowship were currently practising in northern Australia. For NOSM-trained doctors, a significant positive effect of training location on practice location was detected for family practice doctors but not for general specialist doctors. Family practitioners who completed their undergraduate medical education at NOSM and their postgraduate training in northern Ontario had a statistically significant (p<0.001) POR of 33.6 (95%-CI: 16.9 – 79.2) of practising in northern Ontario (115/125) versus other regions; whereas those who completed only their postgraduate training in northern Ontario (46/85) had a statistically significant (p<0.001) POR of 3.7 (95%-CI: 2.1 – 6.8) relative to doctors who only completed their undergraduate medical education at NOSM (28/117). Overall, 30% (22/73) of NOSM’s general speciality graduates currently practise in northern Ontario.
Conclusions: The findings support increasing medical graduate training numbers in rural underserved regions, specifically locating full specialty training programs in regional and rural centres in a “flipped training” model, whereby specialty trainees are based in rural or regional clinical settings with some rotations to the cities. In these circumstances, the doctors would see their regional or rural centre as “home base” with the city rotations as necessary to complete their training requirements while preparing to practise near where they train.