Original Research

Transitioning to rural practice together: a rural fellowship model (in six Ps)

AUTHORS

name here
Benjamin Gilmer
1 MD, Clinical Director, Rural Health Initiative

name here
Chase Harless
2 DrPH, Research Data Analyst

name here
Lauren White Gibson
3 MPH, Program Director, Rural Health Initiative

name here
Jill Fromewick
4 PhD, Research Scientist

name here
Robyn Latessa
5 MD, Chief Academic Officer

name here
Gary Beck Dallaghan
6 PhD, Director of Educational Scholarship

name here
Kylie Agee
7 MPA, Program Manager, Rural Health Initiative *

name here
Bryan Hodge
8 DO, Chair, Department of Community and Public Health

AFFILIATIONS

1, 3, 4, 7, 8 UNC Health Sciences, The University of North Carolina, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, North Carolina, USA

2 Department of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA

5, 6 UNC School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

ACCEPTED: 27 January 2024


early abstract:

Purpose: Maintaining a robust healthcare workforce in underserved rural communities continues to be a challenge. To better meet health care needs in rural areas, training programs must develop innovative ways to foster transition to and integration into these communities. Mountain Area Health Education Center (MAHEC) designed and implemented a twelve-month post-residency Rural Fellowship program to enhance placement, transition, and retention in rural North Carolina. Utilizing a '6 Ps' framework, the program targeted physicians and pharmacists completing residency with the purpose of recruiting and supporting their transition into the first year of rural practice.
Method: To better understand Rural Fellows’ experiences and the immediate impact of their Fellowship year, we conducted a semi-structured interview using a narrative technique and evaluated retention rates over time. Interviews with the eight participants, which consisted of Fellowship alumni and current Fellows, demonstrated the impact and influence of the key curricular '6 Ps' framework.
Results: An early retention rate of 100% and a long-term retention rate of 87 % combined with expressed clarity of curricular knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to the '6 Ps' demonstrate the potential and effectiveness of this Rural Fellowship model. Participants indicated the Rural Fellowship experience supports the transition to rural practice communities and expands their clinical skills.
Conclusion: The Rural Fellowship program demonstrates an effective model to support early career healthcare providers as they begin practice in rural communities in western North Carolina (WNC) through academic opportunities, personal growth, and professional development. Implementation of this model has demonstrated the success of a rural retention model over a six-year period. This model has the potential to target an array of clinical providers and disciplines. We started with family medicine and have expanded to psychiatry, obstetrics, pharmacy and nursing. This study has demonstrated that this model supports clinical providers during the critical transition period from residency to practice. Targeting the most important stage of one’s medical training, the commencement of professional practice, this is a scalable model for other rural-based health professions education sites where rural recruitment and retention remain a problem.