Short Communication

Self-reported measures of preparedness of graduates of a new remote and rural graduate-entry medical programme (ScotGEM)

AUTHOR

name here
Andrew O'Malley
1 PhD, Senior Lecturer * ORCID logo

AFFILIATIONS

1 School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, United Kingdom

ACCEPTED: 11 October 2025


Early Abstract:

Background: Scotland faces persistent challenges in addressing medical workforce shortages, particularly in remote and rural areas. The Scottish Graduate Entry Medicine (ScotGEM) programme was established to address these challenges by training adaptable and resilient medical practitioners with a focus on rural and underserved healthcare settings. Evaluating the preparedness of ScotGEM graduates as they transition into clinical practice is essential for assessing the programme's effectiveness.
Methods: This study utilised data from the General Medical Council (GMC) Foundation Year 1 (F1) Preparedness Survey, which evaluates newly qualified doctors’ self-reported perceptions of preparedness in key domains: overall preparedness, clinical practical procedures, prescribing, and managing acutely unwell patients. Preparedness perceptions of the inaugural ScotGEM cohort were compared to national and Dundee cohorts using Z-tests for proportions and Cohen’s h to quantify effect sizes.
Results: ScotGEM graduates reported levels of preparedness comparable to the national average across all surveyed domains. Specifically, 57.5% of ScotGEM graduates felt adequately prepared for practice (57.9% nationally), 84.6% felt adequately skilled in clinical practical procedures (80.3% nationally), 75% reported adequate prescribing skills (79.3% nationally), and 75% felt prepared to manage acutely unwell patients (79.3% nationally). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between ScotGEM and other cohorts (p > 0.05), with small effect sizes (h < 0.2) indicating minimal practical differences.
Conclusions: ScotGEM graduates demonstrate preparedness levels comparable to their peers nationally and from traditional-entry programmes, underscoring the effectiveness of Scotland's first graduate-entry and rurally delivered medical programme. Future evaluations with larger sample sizes will be essential to detect subtle differences and further refine ScotGEM’s contributions to Scotland's medical workforce, particularly in underserved areas.
Keywords: clinical preparedness, graduate-entry medicine, longitudinal integrated clerkship, medical education, medical workforce, preparedness for practice, rural healthcare, rural medical education, Scotland, ScotGEM, undergraduate medical training.