Editorial

Surgical care at rural district hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: an essential component of universal health coverage

AUTHORS

Kathryn M Chu1 FACS, FASCRS, Director of Centre for Global Surgery *

Priyanka Naidu2 MBChB, Global Surgery Fellow, Operation Smile

name here
Hans J Hendriks3
MMed (FamMed)

Jennifer Nash4 MMed (FamMed), Specialist Family Physician

name here
Francois J Coetzee5
MMed (FamMed), Rural Clinical School MBChB Program Coordinator

Martene Esteves6 BCMP, Clinical Associate

name here
Steve Reid7
MFamMed, PhD, Chair of Primary Health Care

name here
Ian Couper8
MFamMed, FCFP(SA), Professor and Director

CORRESPONDENCE

*Prof Kathryn M Chu

AFFILIATIONS

1 Centre for Global Surgery, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

2 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa

3 Zithulele Hospital, Eastern Cape and Department of Family Medicine, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa

4 Amathole District Clinical Specialist Team (Eastern Cape Province), Eastern Cape Department of Health, South Africa

5, 8 Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa

6 Colorectal Unit, Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa

7 Primary Health Care Directorate, University of Cape Town, South Africa

PUBLISHED

14 June 2020 Volume 20 Issue 2

HISTORY

RECEIVED: 4 March 2020

REVISED: 14 May 2020

ACCEPTED: 14 May 2020

CITATION

Chu KM, Naidu P, Hendriks HJ, Nash J, Coetzee FJ, Esteves M, Reid S, Couper I.  Surgical care at rural district hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: an essential component of universal health coverage. Rural and Remote Health 2020; 20: 5920. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH5920

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSgo to url

ETHICS APPROVAL

Ethics approval to publish opinions and comments from the Rural Health Conference in this editorial was given from the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference Number 161/2019)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence

go to urlCited by

Kathryn Chu: Surgical care at rural district hospitals in low- and middle-income countries

download icon download PDF

doi 10.22605/RRH5920


Keywords:

district hospitals, essential and emergency surgical care, surgery, training, South Africa.

full article:

Background

Surgical care has long been considered too exclusive and uneconomical to be a public health priority1,2, despite one third of the total global burden of disease being attributed to surgical conditions3. Furthermore, five billion people worldwide do not have access to safe and timely surgical care, the majority of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including sub-Saharan Africa4.

The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery has highlighted surgical care as an important component of universal health coverage, urging the world to make surgical, anaesthetic and obstetric services a priority on the global health agenda4. In 2015, the World Health Assembly passed a declaration stating that timely and safe essential and emergency surgical care (EESC) was a key component of universal health coverage and that district hospitals should be the backbone of EESC1. The World Bank further described 44 EESC procedures, 28 of which were categorised as district-level procedures5. In order to achieve equitable access to EESC, strengthening surgical health systems, especially at the district level, requires prioritisation.

The case for developing EESC (which includes the provision of surgery, anaesthesia and obstetric care) at rural district hospitals is compelling. Health care provided closer to the community has been shown to have improved outcomes for people with other types of medical conditions, to reduce patient out-of-pocket expenditures and improve health-seeking behaviour6. In some LMICs, there are long delays to surgical care at higher level hospitals (regional and central hospitals), which can result in increased mortality7-9. A higher level of EESC provided by district hospitals would greatly improve equitable access for patients and decrease the burden on higher level hospitals10,11. Increasing the surgical capacity of rural district hospitals has been recently cited as a key component of health systems strengthening in LMICs and might improve surgical access12. For example, EESC will bring specific transferrable skills to rural hospitals, such as airway and trauma management, thereby increasing the overall capacity to care for emergency and critically ill patients. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, these skills are proving to be particularly important.

There are challenges to increasing district hospital EESC. District hospital surgical services can vary greatly within and between countries, especially in rural areas. Previous studies have reported variable EESC LMIC capacity at rural district hospitals because of lack of appropriate facilities, trained surgical staff or support by higher level hospitals13-17.

South Africa’s Stellenbosch University recently approved the establishment of a Centre for Global Surgery in the Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, which works towards the vision of a world with equitable access to quality surgical care for all. Such initiatives have been growing around the world, in response to the recommendations of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery4, but this is one of the first such centres in Africa. The centre facilitated a workshop on providing quality EESC at rural district hospitals at the 23rd Annual National Rural Health Conference in Port Shepstone, South Africa in September 2019. The discussion provided useful insights into aspects of rural surgical care in LMICs.

Challenges of rural surgical care

The workshop was attended by 20 participants including surgeons, family physicians, generalist doctors and clinical associates (physician assistants). An overview of global surgery and universal health coverage was given, followed by preliminary results of a national survey on surgical capacity at South African district hospitals. Two plenary sessions with group discussions were then held. The first plenary session addressed understanding and meeting the training needs of generalist doctors in rural areas and examined how surgeons, anaesthesiologists and obstetricians working at higher level hospitals could play a role. The second plenary session explored how technology, such as the use of mobile health platforms, could improve communications to facilitate patient co-management and patient transfer between district and higher level hospitals. The following challenges and solutions were identified.

Lack of trained staff

Participants reported that one barrier to providing EESC at rural district hospitals was a lack of an appropriate number of healthcare professionals to form safe surgical teams. To conduct EESC, there needs to be a surgical provider, an anaesthesia provider, theatre personnel and recovery room personnel. For example, in some hospitals, only one doctor with surgical and anaesthetic skills was available to perform the operation. At other rural district hospitals, the rate-limiting factor was the lack of theatre personnel, especially scrub or recovery room nurses.

Lack of training

Another significant challenge was the lack of appropriate levels of skills and training for rural healthcare professionals – which includes doctors, nurses and clinical associates – to provide EESC. Without standardised surgical, obstetric and anaesthetic training across medical schools and internship, EESC skills of rural South African doctors are variable. Some participants reported their surgical skills were self-taught. Family physicians, who have trained in certain surgical procedures, work at many district hospitals; however, most of these facilities only have one of these specialists, which is not enough to form a safe surgical team or provide full time cover. Participants described surgery as the ‘fear of the unknown’ and reported feeling inadequately equipped to care for people with many EESC conditions.

Poor communication and lack of support 

Poor inter-facility communication was identified as a significant barrier to providing EESC at rural district hospitals. Rural healthcare professionals expressed difficulty referring patients to higher levels or obtaining advice on surgical patient management, mostly due to long delays in reaching specialists by phone, bed shortages at referral centres and limited timely ambulance services. Provision of EESC at rural district hospitals by non-specialists is not always adequately supported by specialists from higher level hospitals. Participants reported feeling that they would be criticised by secondary- and tertiary-level hospital surgeons if they attempted surgical procedures and subsequently had poor outcomes. Even when rural healthcare professionals had adequate training for certain surgical procedures, these procedures might still not be performed due to fear of criticism. In addition, training was limited by the lack of formalised mentorship from specialists, outreach, and inreach opportunities.

Skills–resource mismatch

The above problems are compounded by the fact that rural district hospitals often have a mismatch of skills and resources. For example, some have the appropriate infrastructure, such as functional operating theatres and anaesthetic machines, but no skilled surgical or anaesthetic personnel to use them. Other facilities have healthcare professionals skilled to perform surgical and anaesthetic procedures but no physical resources to do so. Some district hospitals are too small with too few staff to conduct operative procedures at all.

Ill-defined role of district hospitals in EESC provision

Another challenge is the lack of a specific national mandate for the role of the district hospitals in EESC provision in many LMICs. Without a national surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia plan that designates the role of each level of hospital, health districts often leave surgical care to higher level hospitals. This has resulted in a lack of direction regarding training needs. In addition, policies from higher level hospital surgical, anaesthesia and obstetric departments regarding which procedures should be performed at the district level are inconsistent or non-existent, thereby compromising supervision and support. This results in people with surgical conditions often being referred unnecessarily to higher level facilities for further management, leading to overburdening of these facilities and delays to care.

Way forward

There are many challenges of EESC provision at rural district hospitals making healthcare professionals more likely to refer people with surgical conditions to higher level facilities rather than provide the care at their own facility. In response to the concerns raised, participants generated several solutions that could improve EESC at rural district hospitals (see Table 1).

The World Bank described a list of 28 cost-effective procedures for EESC that should be performed at district hospitals5. However, this needs to be adapted by each country to its needs. The South African National Department of Health has defined a specific minimum basket of district hospital procedures; however, this package has not been strictly implemented and each district hospital is not held accountable for conducting these procedures18. Once EESC at district hospital level is clearly circumscribed, healthcare professional training and resource allocation can be tailored to provide EESC safely.

Each health district should establish a surgical task team to determine how district hospital EESC will be delivered for the catchment. The task team should include stakeholders from all facilities, such as specialists from second- and third-level hospitals as well as rural district hospital doctors. Service delivery solutions may vary between health districts because they are unique in catchment size, number and types of hospitals, and distances between facilities19. For example, in a metropolitan area, transport time from district- to tertiary-level hospitals may be less than half an hour, while in an LMIC rural area it may take more than eight hours to transfer a patient due to a shortage of ambulances, long physical distances or poor roads20-22.

Explicit in the task team’s mandate is determining the role of each district hospital in EESC based on district surgical needs and the capacity of the secondary and tertiary hospitals. Buy-in for district hospital EESC is critically needed by specialists, who so often consider surgical care delivered by non-specialists to be second rate. Inreach, rotation of rural doctors at secondary- and tertiary-level hospitals; and outreach, rotation of specialists at the district hospital level, can be effective in ensuring a team approach. Incentives to encourage rural doctors to increase their surgical skills can include fast track into a surgical postgraduate training program and/or a credit towards a Diploma in Surgery, a 2-year program currently offered by the College of Medicine in South Africa23.

Task-sharing, or co-management by healthcare professionals of various cadres, is needed for quality EESC. Surgeons, anaesthesiologists and obstetricians from secondary and tertiary hospitals can support district hospital EESC through remote co-management, as part of a larger surgical ecosystem, rather than these hospitals functioning independently. These specialists also need to be available for timely management and referral advice. Mobile health tools, such as WhatsApp or Vula Mobile24, would greatly improve communication, capture data, and could be used as teaching platforms25,26.

Finally, monitoring and evaluation of the quality of care of district hospital EESC is essential and can be done through collection of standard indicators and shared across the health platform. These can detect the need for additional training or co-management. These audits should not be punitive but a method for identifying gaps in the system.

table image Figure 1:  Recommendations to increase surgical capacity at rural district hospitals.

Conclusion

Rural district hospitals should be supported as an essential component of EESC provision. In the case of South Africa, as in many other LMICs, surgical capacity is not well developed at rural district hospitals due to various human resource and bureaucratic barriers. These barriers can, however, be mitigated through political prioritisation, increased support from specialists at higher level facilities, and additional training. Surgery saves lives. Rural district hospitals must improve their safe surgical provision to bring us closer to health care for all.

references:

1 Price R, Makasa E, Hollands M. World Health Assembly Resolution WHA68. ‘Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anesthesia as a component of universal health coverage’ – addressing the public health gaps arising from lack of safe, affordable and accessible surgical and anesthetic services. World Journal of Surgery 2015; 39(9): 2115-2125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3153-y PMid:26239773
2 Spiegel DA, Gosselin RA. Surgical services in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2007; 370(9592): 1013-1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61457-3
3 Shrime MG, Bickler SW, Alkire BC, Mock C. Global burden of surgical disease: an estimation from the provider perspective. Lancet Global Health 2015; 3(Supp 2): S8-S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70384-5
4 Meara JG, Greenberg SLJS. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare and economic development. Surgery 2015; 157(5): 834-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.009 PMid:25934019
5 Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN (Eds). Disease control priorities. Volume 1: Essential surgery. The World Bank, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0346-8
6 Mukora R, Charalambous S, Dahab M, Hamilton R, Karstaedt A. A study of patient attitudes towards decentralisation of HIV care in an urban clinic in South Africa. BMC Health Services Research 2011; 11(1): 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-205 PMid:PMid:21871068
7 Laing GL, Skinner D, Bruce J, Aldous C, Govindasamy V, Thomson S, et al. Auditing surgical service provision at a South African tertiary institution: implications for the development of district services. South African Journal of Surgery 2017; 55(4).
8 Kakembo N, Godier-Furnemont A, Nabirye A, Cheung M, Kisa P, Muzira A, et al. Barriers to pediatric surgical care in low-income countries: the three delays’ impact in Uganda. Journal of Surgical Research 2019; 242: 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.058 PMid:31085367
9 Maine RG, Kajombo C, Purcell L, Gallaher JR, Reid TD, Charles AG. Effect of in-hospital delays on surgical mortality for emergency general surgery conditions at a tertiary hospital in Malawi. BJS Open 2019; 3(3): 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50152 PMid:PMid:31183453
10 Government of South Africa. Gauteng Health on waiting list for operations 2015. Available: https://www.gov.za/speeches/gauteng-health-waiting-list-operations-31-mar-2015-0000 (Accessed 18 September 2019).
11 Bhuiyan M, Mavhungu R, Machowski A. Provision of an emergency theatre in tertiary hospitals is cost-effective: audit and cost of cancelled planned elective general surgical operations at Pietersburg Hospital, Limpopo Province, South Africa. South African Medical Journal 2017; 107(3): 239-242. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i3.10687 PMid:28281430
12 Rajbhandari R, McMahon DE, Rhatigan JJ, Farmer PE. The neglected hospital – the district hospital’s central role in global health care delivery. New England Journal of Medicine 2020; 382(5): 397. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1911298 PMid:31995684
13 Voss M, Duvenage R. Operative surgery at the district hospital. South African Medical Journal 2011; 101(8): 521-522.
14 Reid S, Chabikuli N, Jaques P, Fehrsen G. The procedural skills of rural hospital doctors. South African Medical Journal 1999; 89(7): 769-774.
15 Galukande M, von Schreeb J, Wladis A, Mbembati N, de Miranda H, Kruk ME, et al. Essential surgery at the district hospital: a retrospective descriptive analysis in three African countries. PLoS Medicine 2010; 7(3): e1000243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000243 PMid:20231871
16 LeBrun DG, Chackungal S, Chao TE, Knowlton LM, Linden AF, Notrica MR, et al. Prioritizing essential surgery and safe anesthesia for the Post-2015 Development Agenda: operative capacities of 78 district hospitals in 7 low- and middle-income countries. Surgery 2014; 155(3): 365-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.008 PMid:24439745
17 Mpirimbanyi C, Nyirimodoka A, Lin Y, Hedt-Gauthier BL, Odhiambo J, Nkurunziza T, et al. Emergency general surgery in Rwandan district hospitals: a cross-sectional study of spectrum, management, and patient outcomes. BMC Surgery 2017; 17(1): 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0323-x PMid:29191200
18 Department of Health, Pretoria. A district hospital service package for South Africa: a set of norms and standards. 2002. Available: http://www.kznhealth.gov.za/norms.pdf (Accessed 2 June 2020).
19 Couper I, Hugo J. Management of district hospitals – exploring success. Rural and Remote Health 2005; 5(4): 433. Available: http://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/433 (Accessed 2 June 2020).
20 Kong VY, Aldous C, Clarke DL. Understanding the reasons for delay to definitive surgical care of patients with acute appendicitis in rural South Africa. South African Journal of Surgery 2014; 52(1): 2-4.
21 Slabbert J, Smith W. Patient transport from rural to tertiary healthcare centres in the Western Cape: is there room for improvement? African Journal of Emergency Medicine 2011; 1(1): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2011.04.001
22 Hsia RY, Mbembati NA, Macfarlane S, Kruk ME. Access to emergency and surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa: the infrastructure gap. Health Policy and Planning 2012; 27(3): 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr023 PMid:21441566
23 Degiannis E, Oettle GJ, Smith MD, Veller MG. Surgical Eeducation in South Africa. World Journal of Surgery 2009; 33(2): 170-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9815-2 PMid:18958516
24 Morkel R, Mann ΤΝ, du Preez G, du Toit J. Orthopaedic referrals using a smartphone app: uptake, response times and outcome. South African Medical Journal 2019; 109(11): 859-864. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i11.13986
25 Ganasegeran K, Renganathan P, Rashid A, Al-Dubai SAR. The m-Health revolution: exploring perceived benefits of WhatsApp use in clinical practice. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2017; 97: 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.013 PMid:27919374
26 Anstey Watkins JOT, Goudge J, Gómez-Olivé FX, Griffiths F. Mobile phone use among patients and health workers to enhance primary healthcare: a qualitative study in rural South Africa. Social Science and Medicine 2018; 198: 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.011 PMid:29335160