COVID-19 in north-western Europe: learning lessons from open data

Part of Special Series: WONCA World Rural Health Conference Abstracts 2022go to url


name here
Mike O'Callaghan
1 GP, Researcher *

name here
Liam Glynn
MD, Professor of General Practice ORCID logo


*Dr Mike O'Callaghan


1 University Of Limerick and Irish College of General Practitioners, Bruff, Limerick, Ireland


10 January 2023 Volume 23 Issue 1


RECEIVED: 20 September 2022

ACCEPTED: 20 September 2022


O'Callaghan M, Glynn L.  COVID-19 in north-western Europe: learning lessons from open data. Rural and Remote Health 2023; 23: 8114. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8114


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence

go to urlCited by

no pdf available, use your browser's print function to create one


Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused huge disruption to all communities and health care worldwide. This ongoing pandemic has encouraged international collaboration and cooperation, and this important activity needs to intensify further. Open Data sharing offers researchers the opportunity to compare public health and political responses and subsequent COVID-19 trends.

Methods: This project uses Open Data to summarise trends relating to COVID-19 cases, deaths and eventual engagement with vaccination campaigns for six countries in the Northern Periphery and Arctic Programme (i.e. Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Finland, Sweden, Norway).

Results: Countries examined fell into two groups – countries that achieved near elimination between smaller outbreaks, and those that did not. Rural areas generally experienced slower increases in COVID-19 activity than urban areas, presumably due to the lower density of population and other factors. Rural areas experienced approximately half the COVID-19 deaths when compared with more urbanised regions within the same countries. Interestingly, countries that opted for a more local approach to public health management, particularly Norway, seemed to control outbreaks more effectively than those with a more centralised approach.

Discussion: While contingent on the quality and reach of testing and reporting systems, Open Data can offer us useful insights to appraise national responses and provides context for public health-related decision making.

You might also be interested in:

2019 - A scope of practice that works 'out here': exploring the effects of a changing medical regulatory environment on a rural New Zealand health service

2015 - Comparison of rates of emergency department procedures and critical diagnoses in metropolitan and rural hospitals

2006 - Increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a rural Greek population

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/8114 for the Version of Record.