Project Report

Weaving pathways: talking with our Elders

AUTHORS

name here
Mary J Owen1
MD, Director

name here
Peter M Nalin2
MD, MBA, Department Head

name here
Charlie A Bouverette3
MA, LGSW, Recent Graduate

name here
Ginearosa Carbone4
Medical Student

name here
Charles Neher5
Medical Student

name here
Elisabeth Pederson6
Medical Student

name here
Mangan Golden7
MA, Research Coordinator *

CORRESPONDENCE

*Ms Mangan Golden

AFFILIATIONS

1, 7 Center for American Indian and Minority Health, University of Minnesota Medical School Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA

2 Family Medicine and Biobehavioral Health, University of Minnesota Medical School Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA

3 University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA

4, 5, 6 University of Minnesota Medical School Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA

PUBLISHED

13 January 2022 Volume 22 Issue 1

HISTORY

RECEIVED: 23 April 2021

REVISED: 22 October 2021

ACCEPTED: 27 October 2021

CITATION

Owen MJ, Nalin PM, Bouverette CA, Carbone G, Neher C, Pederson E, Golden M.  Weaving pathways: talking with our Elders . Rural and Remote Health 2022; 22: 6845. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH6845

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSgo to url

ETHICS APPROVAL

Not Human Research Designation - University of Minnesota, Institutional Review Board

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence


abstract:

While there exists a relative paucity of completed healthcare directives nationally in the USA, even fewer exist within minority populations. This report describes one model for bringing advance care planning and discussions to American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) communities. In 2018, Honoring Choices of Minnesota approached the Center of American Indian and Minority Health (CAIMH), housed in the University of Minnesota Medical School, to collaborate on a project to increase healthcare directives in AIAN communities. CAIMH assembled AIAN students, faculty and community members to identify and address barriers to healthcare directive completion and discussions about end-of-life choices. The project team decided upon a two-pronged approach: culturally informed provider training paralleling culturally relevant community engagement. We aimed to empower AIAN to engage with healthcare providers on decisions impacting their care. To further support AIAN patients and their providers, a toolkit was created and will soon be available for dissemination.

Keywords:

American Indian Alaska Native, advance care planning, end of life, healthcare directive, Native American, USA.

full article:

Context

Introduction

In 2018, Honoring Choices Minnesota approached the Center of American Indian and Minority Health (CAIMH) for guidance to bring discussions on end-of-life (EOL) planning to American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) communities. CAIMH is a 47-year-old institution of the University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, created to address American Indian and Alaska Native health disparities. CAIMH strives to increase the workforce of AIAN physicians, educate the broader community on issues impacting AIAN health, and engage in health research with AIAN communities. The longstanding relationships with Ojibwe communities provide the foundation for this project.

Approach

To understand the baseline status of EOL planning in AIAN communities, CAIMH recruited two Native American medical students to conduct a literature review. The review identified several important barriers limiting completion of healthcare directives and impeding discussion of EOL care in AIAN communities. Obstacles included mistrust of healthcare systems, lack of relationships with healthcare staff, varying perceptions of death and dying within families and communities, lack of understanding by healthcare providers about cultural and historical concerns, misconception by providers about AIAN willingness to discuss the topics, language barriers, inaccessible paperwork, issues of jurisdiction, and lack of adequate care and services in rural communities1-9. Favorably, the literature review also revealed that AIAN communities, especially in the great plains and northern regions, are open to culturally responsive programming2,3,6,9.

Given these findings, CAIMH selected culturally based and community-inclusive improvement methods: revise the Honoring Choices advance care documents and develop culturally tailored communications within AIAN communities. Located in Ojibwe country, CAIMH engaged local experts to help craft the communications and contribute to the revisions. CAIMH recruited a regional Tribal elder and an Ojibwe clinical social worker. CAIMH also invited an elders-focused lawyer from Minnesota Legal Aid office to review the revisions. University of Minnesota IRB approved the project. Additionally, we followed appropriate research protocol outlined by each Tribal community and received corresponding approval.

Issues

Rationale

Nationally, about 30% of the population has completed an advance care directive10. Within ethnic and racial minority populations the percentage of completed advance care directives is considerably less3,6. This gap leaves a large portion of the population vulnerable to both care unaligned with one’s EOL wishes and subpar care. Inadequate care at EOL traumatizes the patient and family, strains relationships between healthcare facilities and the community, and reinforces mistrust. There is strong evidence that patients receive the care they want when healthcare directives or advance care planning documents are completed4,6,11,12. Barriers to completion include mistrust by the patient, lack of access to care in rural communities, and misconceptions held by the healthcare providers. AIAN communities experience higher rates of chronic illness and early death, yet receive far less EOL care that is culturally relevant and responsive to personal wishes than in the general population1,3,6,13. Consequently, AIAN community members are at greater risk for unsatisfactory EOL, leading to undue physical, mental, spiritual, and economic hardships3,14,14.

Pilot description

Research highlighted the need for cultural specificity in language, and phrasing as well as artwork2,5,8,13, so CAIMH began the project by culturally tailoring the Honoring Choices long form. The improvements included the addition of artwork created by a local Ojibwe artist. Another improvement changed ‘healthcare agent’ to ‘healthcare decision maker’5 as seen in the literature review. After thorough consideration of several alternatives, this phrasing felt the most straightforward and concise to the work group. The addition of information about autopsies and postmortem care aligned with growth in the interest and practice of traditional EOL practices, which require the body to remain intact15.

We hosted community discussions led by a community elder with years of experience in EOL care. As is customary for this tribal community, food was provided at all events. In addition to emphasizing the necessity for community involvement, our literature review revealed the need to educate and train health practitioners, particularly around misconceptions of death taboos and how to approach EOL topics1-3,5. CAIMH, in partnership with two tribal clinics, organized workshops to familiarize clinic staff and providers with the revised directive and identify ways to start conversations with patients and families using the revised resources. In Minnesota, the medical orders concerning EOL care are documented in the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST). The community discussions and clinical workshops described the differences and uses of both the EOL directive and the POLST.

Lessons learned

Impact 

This project is showing promising results. Following the community discussions and clinical workshops, one tribal clinic has experienced an 18% increase in the number of healthcare directives and/or individuals with advance care documents on file. This encouraging increase reflects the community’s desire for EOL discussions and EOL care. CAIMH will continue to work with the tribal clinic and community to monitor and sustain this trend.

Insights

The pilot events provided many notable insights. Most importantly, sensitive discussions about EOL topics are more effective if delivered through relationship-centered events. While the literature review identified the relational aspects, the initial pilot approach involved larger meetings, which did not result in sufficient community engagement. During the initial kick-off event, a participant suggested an improvement using the smaller and regularly scheduled elders’ group meetings. This pivot proved to be more engaging and foundational, expanding the network of relationships and leading to more suggestions for subsequent events.

After the initial events, we expanded the discussions to more specific themes including patient autonomy, empowerment, and trust. During our discussions with elders and community members, CAIMH emphasized that documenting one’s EOL wishes in an advance care directive makes them more likely to be followed and that the healthcare directive document is legal and binding. Still, changes can be made, so EOL documents can and should be revisited regularly.

The workshops for the healthcare providers covered a number of key points. Impressively, 92% of attendees with previous training about healthcare directives and EOL care considered the information to be new. Key points included the following:

  • Ask patients and their families for permission to initiate a discussion about EOL care rather than assuming the conversation is welcomed.
  • If permission is not given at one visit, consider subsequent visits as opportunities to revisit the potential for discussing advance care decision making, recognizing that just because a patient doesn’t want to talk about it at this time, doesn’t mean they won’t at another time.
  • Approach the subject gently and be mindful of the person’s condition and what else is going on. Further, recognize that EOL care planning can be a longitudinal conversation that doesn’t need to happen all at once.
  • Position the EOL topic in context. For instance, our clinical social worker often begins the conversation, ‘Our ancestors did not have to make these types of decisions’. From experience, engaging the patient about ancestors and how they would approach the situation have been effective starting points.
  • Emphasize that discussions about EOL care is about family and community. Directives support AIAN families and communities to exercise their sovereignty and take control of their healthcare.

Implications

From the vantage of CAIMH, the greatest successes of the EOL project are the development of new collaborations and the strengthening of prior relationships with Tribal communities in the Northern Minnesota region.

Currently, CAIMH is developing an EOL toolkit for community members and practitioners. The EOL toolkit will include video resources and documents that will be accessible via hospital websites and the Honoring Choices Minnesota website. Fundamentally, the toolkit can serve as a useful guide for each community to optimize a relationship-centered approach to EOL discussions to fit the specific needs and community resources.

Responses to the project have been encouraging and positive. Healthcare providers and the community demonstrate more willingness to engage in EOL conversations. At this stage in the project, new questions have emerged. For instance, how do we connect with younger generations to broaden the conversations? Ultimately, the goal is to empower the entire community. More empowerment can lead to more conversations among providers, patients, and families. More EOL conversations can ensure community members exercise their healthcare rights and wishes in EOL care.

Acknowledgements

CAIMH acknowledges that we work and live on the ancestral and current lands of the Ojibwe people. We thank our tribal and community partners for making this project possible. In honor of their sovereignty, we respect their request to remain individually unnamed. We also thank Honoring Choices of Minnesota for their financial and professional support of this project.

references:

1 Marr L, Neale D, Wolfe V, Kitzes J. Confronting myths: the Native American experience in an academic inpatient palliative care consultation program. Journal of Palliative Medicine 2012; 15(1): 71-76. DOI link, PMid:22242715
2 Isaacson MJ. Wakanki Ewastepikte: an advanced directive education project with American Indian elders. Journal of Hospice Palliative Nursing 2017; 19(6): 580-587. DOI link
3 Dennis MK, Washington KT. ‘Just let me go’: end-of-life planning among Ojibwe elders. Gerontologist 2018; 58(2): 300-307. DOI link, PMid:27927735
4 Nadin S, Crow M, Prince H, Kelley ML. Wiiokotaatiwin: development and evaluation of a community-based palliative care program in Naotkamegwanning First Nation. Rural and Remote Health 2018; 18(2): 4317. DOI link, PMid:29724108
5 Russell B, Fred DE, Brown C. Culturally safe end-of-life care for First Nations persons living on reserve. Rural and Remote Health 2018; 8(3): 4500. DOI link, PMid:30144793
6 Lillie KM, Dirks LG, Curtis JR, Candrian C, Kutner JS, Shaw JL. Culturally adapting an advance care planning communication intervention with American Indian and Alaska Native people in primary care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 2019; 31(2): 1 July. DOI link, PMid:31258037
7 Schill K, Caxaj S. Cultural safety strategies for rural Indigenous palliative care: a scoping review. BMC Palliative Care 2019; 18: 21. DOI link, PMid:30764810
8 Hampton M, Baydala A, Drost C, McKay-McNabb K. Bridging conventional western health practices with traditional Aboriginal approaches to end of life care: a dialogue between Aboriginal families and healthcare professionals. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics 2009; 4: 22-66.
9 Colclough Y, Brown GM. Moving toward openness: Blackfeet Indians' perception changes regarding talking about end of life. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care 2019; 36(4): 282-289. DOI link, PMid:30556405
10 Yadav KN, Gabler NB, Cooney E, Kent S, Kim J, Herbst N, et al. Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end-of-life care. Health Affairs 2017; 36(7): 1244-1251. DOI link, PMid:28679811
11 Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomized control trial. BMJ 2010; 340: c1345. DOI link, PMid:20332506
12 Houben CHM, Spruit MA, Groenen MTJ, Wouters EFM, Jassen DJA. Efficacy of advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Directors Association 2014; 15(7): 477-489. DOI link, PMid:24598477
13 Issacson MJ, Lynch AR. Culturally relevant palliative and end-of-life care for U.S. Indigenous populations: an integrative review. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 2018; 29(2): 180-191. DOI link, PMid:28826379
14 Prince H, Mushquash C, Kelley ML. Improving end-of-life care in First Nations Communities: outcomes of a participatory action research project. Psynopsis 2016; 38(4): 17-19. Available: web link (Accessed 20 November 2019).
15 Dundes Benteln A. The rights of the dead: autopsies and corpses mismanagement in multicultural societies. The South Atlantic Quarterly 2001; 100(4): 1005-1027. Available: web link, DOI link (Accessed 21 February 2020).