Original Research

Expanding national health insurance coverage in Indonesia’s remote areas: who should be prioritized?

AUTHORS

name here
Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni
1 PhD, Senior Researcher ORCID logo

name here
Agung Dwi Laksono
1 PhD, Senior Researcher

name here
Asep Kusnali
1 MEc, Junior Researcher * ORCID logo

name here
Leny Latifah
1 PhD, Senior Researcher

name here
Irfan Ardani
1 MPH, Junior Researcher

name here
Rofingatul Mubasyiroh
1 MPH, Junior Researcher ORCID logo

name here
Diah Yunitawati
1 MPH, Junior Researcher ORCID logo

name here
Tati Suryati Warouw
1 PhD, Senior Researcher

name here
Tety Rachmawati
1 MSc, Senior Researcher

CORRESPONDENCE

*Mr Asep Kusnali

AFFILIATIONS

1 National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia

PUBLISHED

29 January 2026 Volume 26 Issue 1

HISTORY

RECEIVED: 4 February 2025

REVISED: 15 September 2025

ACCEPTED: 5 November 2025

CITATION

Nugraheni WP, Laksono AD, Kusnali A, Latifah L, Ardani I, Mubasyiroh R, Yunitawati D, Warouw TS, Rachmawati T.  Expanding national health insurance coverage in Indonesia’s remote areas: who should be prioritized? Rural and Remote Health 2026; 26: 9761. https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH9761

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSgo to url

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence


Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to ascertain the target population for expanding National Health Insurance (NHI) coverage in remote areas of Indonesia.
Methods: This study used secondary data for 130,331 people from the 2023 National Socio-economic Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional household survey conducted by Indonesian Statistics. NHI membership was used as a dependent variable. The study examined residence, age, gender, marital status, education, and occupation as independent variables. In the last phase, binary logistic regression was used.
Results: The NHI membership rate in disadvantaged regions of Indonesia was 74.5%. People in rural areas were 1.11 times more likely to be NHI members than those in non-rural areas (95%CI 1.06–1.16). Age was related to NHI membership. Married people were 1.29 times more likely than those never married to be NHI members (95%CI 1.25–1.34). Divorced/widowed people were 1.16 times more likely than those never married to be NHI members (95%CI 1.08–1.23). People at all other education levels than primary school education were more likely to be NHI members. Employed people were 1.36 times more likely to be NHI members than those who were unemployed (95%CI 1.31–1.40). The wealthier the people, the higher the likelihood of them being NHI members.
Conclusion: Based on the study's results, the target population includes non-rural residents in disadvantaged regions as well as never-married individuals, those with primary education or less, those who are unemployed, and the poorest wealth quintile, requiring interventions like mobile enrolment units and simplified registration protocols.

Keywords

disadvantaged areas, Indonesia, National Health Insurance, public health, Universal Health Coverage.

Introduction

The National Health Insurance Program (NHI) was introduced with the primary objective of providing broader and more affordable access to healthcare services for all Indonesian citizens. It aims to reduce disparities in healthcare access among different societal groups, enhance the quality of healthcare services, and protect the population from the financial risks associated with healthcare costs1. This aligns with the international commitment outlined in the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which mandate that every country be able to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC) by 20302.

The implementation of NHI commenced in 2014 with a focus on expanding membership coverage. Initially, the primary focus was on registration efforts and participant selection, including mapping participants based on socioeconomic status. Despite significant increases in the number of registered members in recent years, challenges persist in encompassing all segments of society, particularly in underserved areas. Based on health insurance statistics for 2016–2021, NHI membership status as of December 2021 had covered 235 million participants or 86.55% of Indonesia's population3,4. This figure falls short of the membership target set in the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN), which aims for 98.6% coverage of the population by 20255.

Underserved regions often face greater challenges in NHI registration and maintenance6. Factors such as limited access to information, inadequate infrastructure, and financial inability pose major obstacles to expanding NHI membership in these areas7,8. Additionally, public awareness and trust in the importance of NHI play a role in people’s willingness to utilize NHI as healthcare assurance for themselves and their families9,10.

NHI membership in Indonesia is influenced by several factors. A study using data from the 2018, 2019, and 2020 national socio-economic surveys in Indonesia identified several critical variables related to private health insurance membership. These variables include age, sex, education, economic status (measured by per-capita expenditure), employment status, marital status, household status, and location of residence11. A study on the elderly population (aged 60 years and over) in Indonesia found that NHI coverage for the elderly is already good, although there are still high disparities in some regions. The study showed that the NHI membership status of the elderly has a significant relationship with age, place of residence, education level, and wealth status12. These studies provide valuable insights into the factors influencing NHI membership in different demographic groups in Indonesia.

Cultural factors can also influence NHI membership in Indonesia. While specific studies focusing on cultural factors are limited, several sociodemographic factors that are often intertwined with cultural aspects have been identified. For example, in some cultures, younger people may be less likely to see the value in health insurance as they feel less vulnerable to health risks. Similarly, in rural areas, traditional beliefs and practices can influence perceptions of health and healthcare, affecting decisions to participate in NHI13.

By 2020, 222.5 million individuals had signed up for NHI, equating to 81.3% of Indonesia’s total population14. Despite these achievements, there are still significant disparities in NHI coverage across different regions, particularly in disadvantaged areas. These areas often face challenges in terms of healthcare access and quality, which can affect the enrolment of NHI. The government has made efforts to expand NHI coverage in these areas, exemplified by the issuance of Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 2022, which aims to optimize the implementation and sustainability of the NHI program while increasing access to quality health services. To increase participation in disadvantaged areas through this regulation, an affirmative policy of using the Village Funds Program, a national initiative that allocates state budget funds directly to villages for local development and welfare programs, is carried out to support the optimization of the implementation of the NHI program, especially in rural areas.

The government should guarantee UHC promotes equity and social justice by reducing disparities in healthcare access between different socioeconomic groups through programs like the NHI15. Guaranteeing access to healthcare services for everyone contributes to better public health outcomes. By providing timely and affordable healthcare services, especially preventive care, the government can reduce the burden of disease and improve overall population health. Lack of access to healthcare can push individuals and families into poverty due to high out-of-pocket healthcare expenses16. UHC, including the NHI program, helps protect people from catastrophic health expenditures and reduces the financial burden of health care, thereby contributing to poverty alleviation efforts. Distinct from Hasan et al’s analysis of private insurance ownership using pooled 2018–2020 National Socioeconomic Survey data11, this study (1) focused exclusively on NHI enrollment gaps within government-designated disadvantaged regions (Presidential Regulation 63/2020: ‘Determining underdeveloped regions for 2020–2024’), (2) utilized 2023 national data capturing post-pandemic equity challenges, and (3) identified precise priority groups for targeted enrollment expansion, addressing critical evidence gaps in accelerating UHC for underserved geographies. 

Based on the narration, the study analyzed factors related to NHI membership to determine the target of expanding the number of NHI members in underprivileged areas in Indonesia.

Methods

Data source

Secondary data from the 2023 National Socio-economic Survey were utilized in the research. Concurrently, the research was a cross-sectional survey conducted at the national level by Statistics Indonesia. The survey gathered information throughout March 2023.

The 2023 National Socio-economic Survey encompasses the entire domestic population of Indonesia. The national survey covers a sample size of 345,000 households distributed among 514 districts/cities and 34 provinces in Indonesia. The present study analyzed a subset of this cohort, focusing exclusively on individuals from disadvantaged regions. The number of census block samples utilized in the survey was 34,500. Systematic sampling was employed to select 10 households from each block using probability-proportional-to-size sampling. In specific census blocks, stratification was performed at the household and census block levels to generate a representative sample. Explicit stratification is implemented in census blocks (for the 2020 Population Census, all residents are grouped into regular census blocks based on urban/rural classification). Implicit stratification is determined by the educational attainment of the chief of the household17.

All Indonesian individuals aged 15 years or more residing in disadvantaged regions based on Presidential Regulation 63/2020 were included. After applying geographical filters, the final analytical sample comprised 130,331 respondents.

Setting

This study investigates the NHI membership in the underprivileged districts of Indonesia. Presidential Regulation 63/2020 establishes the boundaries of poor regions. According to the regulation, underdeveloped areas in Indonesia include 62 districts in 11 provinces (Table 1).

Dependent variable

NHI membership was incorporated as an outcome variable in the study. The study's scope of NHI included all forms of participation, including coverage provided by enterprises or with government support; mandatory enrolment for public servants, police, and army personnel; and coverage obtained through other means. In the survey, ‘no’ or ‘yes’ were the response options for NHI membership.

Table 1: Provinces and districts constituting underdeveloped areas in Indonesia

Province District(s)
North Sumatera Nias, South Nias, North Nias, West Nias
West Sumatera Mentawai Islands
South Sumatera North Musi Rawas
Lampung West Pesisir
West Nusa Tenggara North Lombok
East Nusa Tenggara West Sumba, East Sumba, Kupang, South Timor Tengah, Belu, Alor, Lembata, Rote Ndao, Central Sumba, Southwest Sumba, East Manggarai, Sabu Raijua, Malaka
Central Sulawesi Donggala, Tojo Una-una, Sigi
Maluku West Maluku Tenggara, Aru Islands, West Seram, East Seram, Southwest Maluku, South Buru
North Maluku Sula Islands, Taliabu Island
West Papua Wondama Gulf, Bintuni Gulf, South Sorong, Sorong, Tambrauw, Maybrat, South Manokwari, Arfak Mountains
Papua Jayawijaya, Nabire, Paniai, Puncak Jaya, Boven Digoel, Mappi, Asmat, Yahukimo, Bintang Mountains, Tolikara, Keerom, Waropen, Supiori, Great Mamberamo, Nduga, Lanny Jaya, Central Mamberamo, Yalimo, Puncak, Dogiyai, Intan Jaya, Deiyai

Independent variables

Seven independent variables were utilized in the research, and seven criteria were incorporated as components of those variables. The seven criteria were domicile, age, gender, marital status, level of education, employment status, and wealth status. Residence was reclassified as rural (‘yes’/’no’) using Indonesian Statistics Regulation 120/2020, which defines urban areas by population density (>1500/km²), infrastructure coverage, and non-agricultural economic dominance.

Age was determined for this study by considering the respondent's most recent birthday. Gender was classified into two discrete categories in the survey: male and female. Marital status of respondents was classified into three distinct categories: never-married individuals, married individuals, and those who were divorced or bereaved. The respondent's education pertains to their most recent scholarly credential. Four levels of education are considered in the study: primary school, junior high, senior high, and collegiate. Employment status is categorized into two distinct groups: employed and unemployed.

The income status of participants was determined using the wealth index formula, using a weighted average of a household's expenditures. The formula considered essential household expenditures such as housing, food, and health care, among other components. Wealth status was divided into five distinct categories in the survey: impoverished, poorer, middle, wealthier, and most wealth18.

Data analysis

In the preliminary stages of the sample, the research utilized the χ2 test to compare the dichotomous variable across two variables. Concurrently, the research used the t-test to examine the continuous age variable. The study incorporated a collinearity test to ascertain the absence of significant correlation among the final regression model's independent variables. Binary logistic regression was utilized to analyse the study's concluding findings. The research used a previously developed method to investigate the multivariate correlation between all independent factors and NHI membership in the survey. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS v26 (IBM Corp; https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics).

Ethics approval

This investigation, utilizing secondary data, is exempt from formal ethical review according to the policies of the National Ethics Committee of the National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

Results

The inquiry ascertained that the mean NHI membership rate in disadvantaged regions of Indonesia in 2023 was 74.5%. The descriptive data of the participants are presented in Table 2. Rural areas dominated both NHI membership groups in terms of residence type. NHI members were older than non-NHI members, on average. Males were more numerous than females in both NHI membership types. Based on marital status, ‘never married’ dominated both NHI membership groups.

The sample predominantly comprised individuals who had completed primary education (Table 2). This group exhibited the lowest rate of National Health Insurance (NHI) enrolment. A discernible gradient is evident, whereby NHI participation rates increase consistently with higher levels of educational attainment, peaking among college graduates. A comparable positive socioeconomic gradient is observed in relation to wealth status: membership in the NHI scheme rises proportionally with household affluence. Although a larger proportion of the study population was unemployed, employed individuals showed a significantly higher rate of NHI membership.

We subsequently performed the collinearity examination. The results of the test suggest that there is no observable correlation among the independent variables. Each variable has a variance inflation factor value less than 10.00, whereas the tolerance value is more significant than 0.10. The absence of multicollinearity in the regression model was identified during the investigation, suggesting that the test's basis for deriving conclusions was strong.

Table 2 presents the binary logistic regression analysis results regarding NHI membership in underprivileged regions of Indonesia. Regarding residence type, people in rural areas are 1.11 times more likely to be NHI members than those in non-rural areas (95%CI 1.06–1.16). The adjusted odds ratio for age (0.65; 95%CI 0.65–0.66) indicates that each additional year reduces NHI enrolment likelihood by 35%. According to marital status, married people were 1.29 times more likely than those never married to be NHI members (95%CI 1.25–1.34). Divorced/widowed people were 1.16 times more likely than those never married to be NHI members (95%CI 1.08–1.23).

Table 3 indicates that, based on education level, people with all other education levels than primary school education were more likely to be NHI members. Employed people were 1.36 times more likely to be NHI members than those who were unemployed (95%CI 1.31–1.40). Regarding wealth status, the results indicate that the wealthier the people, the higher the likelihood of them being a NHI members.

Table 2: Descriptive statistics of study participants (n=130,331)

Characteristic Variable National Health Insurance membership p-value

No (n=33,198)

Yes (n=97,133)

n / mean

%

n / mean %
Rural No 3080 24.0 9741 76.0 <0.001
Yes

30,118

25.6 87,392 74.4
Mean age (years)   23.6   29.9   <0.001
Gender Male 16,931 25.5 49,376 74.5 0.604
Female

16,267

25.4 47,757 74.6
Marital status Never married 20,376 30.1 47,266 69.9 <0.001
Married

11,300

20.3 44,355 79.7
Divorced/widowed

1522

21.6 5512 78.4
Education level Primary school 24,519 28.1 62,887 71.9 <0.001
Junior high school

4152

21.9 14,831 78.1
Senior high school

3550

20.4 13,881 79.6
College

977

15.0 5534 85.0
Employment status Unemployed 22,131 29.9 51,994 70.1 <0.001
Employed

11067

19.7 45,139 80.3
Wealth status Poorest 16,131 30.4 37,000 69.6 <0.001
Poorer

7661

26.4 21,371 73.6
Middle

4533

23.2 15,025 76.8
Wealthier

2999

18.8 12,939 81.2
Most wealthy

1874

14.8 10,798 85.2

χ2 test result
t-test result

Table 3: Outcome of binary logistic regression analysis on National Health Insurance membership in disadvantaged areas in Indonesia in 2023 (n=130,331)

Predictor National Health Insurance membership

p-value

Adjusted odds ratio 95%CI
Lower bound Upper bound
Rural: No (ref.)
Rural: Yes <0.001*** 1.11 1.06 1.16
Age <0.001*** 0.65 0.65 0.66
Gender: Male (ref.)
Gender: Female 0.546 1.07 1.04 1.10
Marital: Never married (ref.)
Marital: Married <0.001*** 1.29 1.25 1.34
Marital: Divorced/widowed <0.001*** 1.16 1.08 1.23
Education: Primary school (ref.)
Education: Junior high school <0.001*** 1.31 1.26 1.36
Education: Senior high school <0.001*** 1.22 1.17 1.27
Education: College <0.001*** 1.51 1.40 1.62
Employment: Unemployed (ref.)
Employment: Employed <0.001*** 1.36 1.31 1.40
Wealth: Poorest (ref.)
Wealth: Poorer <0.001*** 1.17 1.13 1.20
Wealth: Middle <0.001*** 1.35 1.30 1.41
Wealth: Wealthier <0.001*** 1.73 1.65 1.81
Wealth: Wealthiest <0.001*** 2.16 2.05 2.28

*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001
CI, confidence interval. Ref., reference value.

Discussion

The results of this study showed that people living in rural areas are more likely to be NHI members compared to non-rural people in disadvantaged areas. Disadvantaged areas in Indonesia are predominantly in eastern Indonesia. Research on health insurance in the province of Papua showed that there is a relationship between place of residence and primary healthcare utilization, with Papuans in rural areas and those aged over 65 years using primary health care more often than other groups19. The observed higher NHI membership in rural disadvantaged areas primarily reflects the government's targeted subsidy program (PBI/Jamkesda) for impoverished populations. However, membership does not inherently translate to service utilization, as geographical barriers, including provider shortages and transportation limitations, persistently constrain physical access to primary care facilities. While Wenang et al (2021) confirm basic services reach some remote communities8, comprehensive healthcare access requires parallel infrastructure investments. Meanwhile, people who do not receive contribution assistance from the government and non-remote communities use more advanced health services. This situation shows that primary healthcare access points have been widely used by most of those who are poor and by people living in rural or remote areas8. This pattern of marginally lower NHI membership among rural populations contrasts with national-level studies14,20,21 that reported higher non-rural enrolment rates in Indonesia’s general population.

Contrary to patterns observed in Ghana and the US22,23, this study identified a significant negative association between age and NHI enrolment in Indonesia’s disadvantaged regions (Table 3). Each year of increased age corresponded to a 35% reduction in the likelihood of membership. Individuals with higher ages are more inclined to prioritize their health as they experience a higher utilization of healthcare services23. A study in Germany had a different result, stating that younger adults had a better willingness to pay for health insurance due to better financial capability24. The correlation between age and NHI enrolment can also be attributed to an individual's financial stability, which in turn influences their choice and opportunity of health insurance types and enrolment25.

According to marital status, married and divorced/widowed people were likelier than those never married to be NHI members, with the highest odds for those with married status. Research in Zambia revealed that marital status (being married) was associated with increased health insurance membership exclusively among women26, while studies in Jordan, South Africa, and Nigeria found the higher odds of insurance membership only significant for adults currently with married status27,28. The increased likelihood of higher health insurance membership among married couples can be attributed to their ability to combine resources and afford health insurance26. Persons with married status also had higher necessities for health insurance, for instance in relation to pregnancy, compared to unmarried individuals29.

Those with all other levels of education compared to primary school education had a higher chance of becoming NHI members, and education level is positively correlated with the possibility of NHI membership. Individuals with low education often have barriers to knowledge and understanding of the principles of health insurance, which becomes a barrier to NHI membership. Conversely, those with higher educational status find it easier to understand the risks of spending related to health services, so they realize the importance of health insurance protection30. Another influencing factor is trust in the insurance scheme administrator and distrust related to past bad experiences. These findings reveal significant insurance coverage disparities disproportionately favoring socioeconomically advantaged groups, with higher educational attainment strongly predicting NHI membership. This research found that the lower the degree of education, the larger the barriers to becoming an NHI member. Another significant influence is that most people with limited education do not have work14. This study's findings are consistent with earlier studies on health insurance membership among women in specific countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Other important indicators of insurance membership include age, marital status, place of residence, economic standing, employment, and media access31.

Employed people were more likely to be NHI members than those who were unemployed. Several conditions can explain these findings: in many countries with NHI systems, including Indonesia and its NHI program, employers are required by law to enroll their employees in the national health insurance scheme and contribute to their premiums1,32. This means that individuals who are employed are automatically enrolled in NHI through their workplace, whereas unemployed individuals may need to actively seek membership. Employed individuals typically have a stable source of income, making it easier for them to afford health insurance premiums33. In contrast, unemployed individuals may face financial constraints that make it difficult for them to pay for health insurance, even if subsidized by the government. Employees often receive information about NHI enrollment and benefits through their employers or workplace channels. This exposure to information may increase their likelihood of being aware of and participating in the NHI program. In some cases, unemployed individuals may be covered under the NHI program as dependents of family members who are employed32. However, this coverage may be less common or comprehensive compared to being directly enrolled as an employee.

The study results indicate that the wealthier the people, the higher the likelihood of being NHI members. Wealthier individuals generally have higher incomes and greater financial resources, making it easier for them to afford health insurance premiums34. They are more likely to be able to allocate a portion of their income to pay for health insurance without experiencing financial strain. Wealthier individuals are more likely to be employed in formal sectors where mandated health insurance benefits increase their likelihood of NHI enrolment, leading to higher membership rates among this group. Also, wealthier individuals often have better access to information about the benefits of health insurance and the enrolment process. There is a stigma associated with not having health insurance among wealthier individuals, who may view health insurance as a symbol of social status and financial stability35,36. This societal pressure or expectation may lead them to prioritize enrolment in NHI to maintain their social standing.

These findings yield critical operational implications for accelerating Indonesia's progress towards UHC. First, a precision targeting framework should prioritize five groups exhibiting the lowest enrolment rates: rural residents, never-married adults, populations with only primary education or less, those who are unemployed, and the poorest wealth quintile. For these groups, tailored interventions are warranted such as mobile enrolment units with pictorial forms for low-literacy communities, and digital campaigns emphasizing individual financial protection for young singles. Second, policy integration should leverage existing instruments, particularly by allocating 20% or more of village funds (per Presidential Instruction 1/2022) to last-mile enrolment drives, which are targeted outreach initiatives such as mobile registration units and community-based awareness campaigns designed to reach remote, underserved, and hard-to-enrol populations. These efforts should be measured through clearly defined registration key performance indicators. Concurrently, integrating NHI registration with the Unified Database for Social Welfare (DTKS) would automate premium subsidies for eligible households. Third, accountability must be strengthened through public district-level dashboards tracking enrolment disparities by wealth/education quintiles, and by linking village fund disbursements to equity targets. Embedding these approaches within Indonesia's village governance structures offers a pragmatic pathway to achieving 98.6% NHI coverage by 2025 while redressing systemic inequities.

Limitation

The data used in this study were processed from an earlier cross-sectional survey. The authors could not verify the temporal correlation between the exposure variable and the result. The investigation did not investigate several well-established variables, such as income, smoking habit, and history of chronic illness, found in other studies that looked into the determinants of health insurance membership20,37,38.

Conclusion

Based on the findings outlined, it is evident that numerous pivotal factors impact NHI membership in deprived regions of Indonesia, encompassing residence type, age, marital status, level of education, employment status, and wealth status. These findings underscore the intricate interaction of socioeconomic elements in shaping NHI membership, thereby spotlighting significant enrollment disparities across demographic strata particularly affecting rural residents, never-married individuals, and low-education groups in disadvantaged regions. Addressing these inequities through precision targeting is paramount for achieving Indonesia’s UHC targets. Remedying these inequalities is paramount for attaining equitable healthcare coverage and realizing the objective of universal health provision. It is imperative to acknowledge limitations such as the inability to establish temporal correlation and the exclusion of certain variables like income and chronic illness history, which could offer further insights into the determinants of NHI membership.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1 Nugraheni WP, Mubasyiroh R, Hartono RK. The influence of Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) on the cost of delivery services in Indonesia. PLOS One 2020; 15(7): e0235176. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235176 PMid:32614846https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32614846
2 Biscoe G, David AM, Effler P, Hong YC, Morgan C, Raviglione MCB, et al. UHC – the critical platform towards a healthier and safer future in 2030 and beyond. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific 2022; 25: 100529. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100529 PMid:35880034https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35880034
3 Indonesian Statistics. Indonesian population projection 2020–2050. Results of the 2020 Population Census. Indonesian Statistics, 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/05/16/fad83131cd3bb9be3bb2a657/proyeksi-penduduk-indonesia-2020-2050-hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html. (Accessed 7 January 2026).
4 National Social Security Council. National Health Insurance Statistics 2016–2021. National Social Security Council, 2022. https://djsn.go.id/files/dokumen/Dokumen Kajian/202212131425Buku Statistik JKN 2016-2021.pdf. (Accessed 23 May 2024).
5 Republic of Indonesia. Appendix I Presidential Regulation No. 12 of 2025 concerning the National Medium-Term Development Plan for 2025–2029. Republic of Indonesia, 2025. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/314638/perpres-no-12-tahun-2025. (Accessed 16 August 2025).
6 Maulana N, Soewondo P, Adani N, Limasalle P, Pattnaik A. How Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) coverage influences out-of-pocket (OOP) payments by vulnerable populations in Indonesia. PLOS Global Public Health 2022; 2(7): e0000203. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000203 PMid:36962301https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36962301
7 Misnaniarti Nugraheni WP, Laksono AD, Kusnali A, Ardani I, Latifah L, et al. National health insurance membership in Indonesia: do socio-economic elements matter? PLOS One 2025; 20: e0329781. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329781 PMid:40811683https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40811683
8 Wenang S, Schaefers J, Afdal A, Gufron A, Geyer S, Dewanto I, et al. Availability and accessibility of primary care for the remote, rural, and poor population of Indonesia. Frontiers in Public Health 2021; 9: 721886. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.721886 PMid:34621720https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34621720
9 Laksono AD, Wulandari RD, Efendi DE, Tumaji T, Nantabah ZK. Role of socioeconomic status in National Health Insurance ownership in Indonesia’s rural areas. Journal of Research in Health Sciences 2024; 24(1): e00608. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.34172/jrhs.2024.143 PMid:39072544https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39072544
10 Raharja DP, Hanani R, Joyoadisumarta FS, Jessani NS, Mathauer I. The impact of informal patient navigation initiatives on patient empowerment and National Health Insurance responsiveness in Indonesia. BMJ Global Health 2022; 7: e009526. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009526 PMid:36379590https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36379590
11 Hasan AR, Bachtiar A, Candi C. The potential of private health insurance ownership based on the 2018–2020 National Socioeconomic Survey data. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional 2022; 17(4): 279286. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v17i4.6214
12 Raharja MB, Zaly NW, Fadila W, Catursaptani R, Utomo W. Elderly and health insurance coverage in Indonesia. Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan 2023; 12(2): 239248. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20473/jbk.v12i2.2023.239-248
13 Muhlis ANA. Determinants of the national health insurance uptake in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Health Administration 2022; 10(1): 111121. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.20473/jaki.v10i1.2022.111-121
14 Laksono AD, Nantabah ZK, Wulandari RD, Khoiri A, Tahangnacca M. Barriers to expanding the national health insurance membership in Indonesia: who should the target? Journal of Primary Care and Community Health 2022; 13. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/21501319221111112 PMid:35818670https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35818670
15 Jaca A, Malinga T, Iwu-Jaja CJ, Nnaji CA, Okeibunor JC, Kamuya D, et al. Strengthening the health system as a strategy to achieving a universal health coverage in underprivileged communities in Africa: a scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19(1): 587. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010587 PMid:35010844https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35010844
16 Onah MN, Govender V. Out-of-pocket payments, health care access and utilisation in South-Eastern Nigeria: a gender perspective. PLOS One 2014; 9(4): e0093887. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093887 PMid:24728103https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24728103
17 Indonesian Statistics. The 2023 Indonesian health statistics profile. Indonesian Statistics, 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/12/20/feffe5519c812d560bb131ca/profil-statistik-kesehatan-2023.html. (Accessed 7 January 2026).
18 Wulandari RD, Qomarrudin MB, Supriyanto S, Laksono AD. Socioeconomic disparities in hospital utilization among elderly people in Indonesia. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development 2019; 10(11): 18001804. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.03885.3
19 Laksono AD, Nugraheni WP, Ipa M, Rohmah N, Wulandari RD. The role of government-run insurance in primary health care utilization: a cross-sectional study in Papua region, Indonesia, in 2018. International Journal of Social Determinants of Health and Health Services 2022; 53(1): 8593. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00207314221129055
20 Sari B, Idris H. Determinant of independent national health insurance ownership in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 2019; 19(2): 109115. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol.19/no.2/art.177
21 Widiarti IP, Idris H. Factors associated with independent National Health Insurance ownership among reproductive aged women in Indonesia. Makara Journal of Health Research 2022; 26(1). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.7454/msk.v26i1.1309
22 Keisler-Starkey K, Bunch LN. Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2021. 2022. http://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/demo/p60-274.pdf.
23 van der Wielen N, Falkingham J, Channon AA. Determinants of National Health Insurance enrolment in Ghana across the life course: are the results consistent between surveys? International Journal for Equity in Health 2018; 17(1): 49. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0760-x PMid:29685137https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29685137
24 Hajek A, Enzenbach C, Stengler K, Glaesmer H, Hinz A, Röhr S, et al. Determinants of willingness to pay for health insurance in Germany – results of the Population-Based Health Study of the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE-Adult-Study). Frontiers in Public Health 2020; 8: 456. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00456 PMid:32984246https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984246
25 Atake EH. Does the type of health insurance enrollment affect provider choice, utilization and health care expenditures? BMC Health Services Research 2020; 20(1): 1003. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05862-7 PMid:33143717https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33143717
26 Mulenga J, Mulenga MC, Musonda KMC, Phiri C. Examining gender differentials and determinants of private health insurance coverage in Zambia. BMC Health Services Research 2021; 21(1): 1212. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07253-y PMid:34753465https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753465
27 Akokuwebe ME, Idemudia ES. A comparative cross-sectional study of the prevalence and determinants of health insurance coverage in Nigeria and South Africa: a multi-country analysis of demographic health surveys. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022; 19(3): 1766. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031766 PMid:35162789https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162789
28 Liu M, Luo Z, Zhou D, Ji L, Zhang H, Ghose B, et al. Determinants of health insurance ownership in Jordan: a cross-sectional study of population and family health survey 2017–2018. BMJ Open 2021; 11(3): e038945. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038945 PMid:33664063https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33664063
29 Dunga SH, Mhlanga D. Determinants of demand for health insurance in South Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies 2020; 12(2): 238254.
30 Dror DM, Hossain SAS, Majumdar A, Koehlmoos TLP, John D, Panda PK. What factors affect voluntary uptake of community-based health insurance schemes in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS One 2016; 11(8): e0160479. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160479 PMid:27579731https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579731
31 Shao L, Wang Y, Wang X, Ji L, Huang R. Factors associated with health insurance ownership among women of reproductive age: a multicountry study in sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS One 2022; 17(4): e0264377. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264377 PMid:35413063https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35413063
32 Liu Y, Jin GZ. Employer contribution and premium growth in health insurance. Journal of Health Economics 2015; 39: 228247. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.08.006 PMid:25241905https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25241905
33 Dartanto T, Halimatussadiah A, Rezki JF, Nurhasana R, Siregar CH, Bintara H, et al. Why do informal sector workers not pay the premium regularly? Evidence from the National Health Insurance System in Indonesia. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2020; 18(1): 8196. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00518-y PMid:31535352https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31535352
34 Amporfu E. Equity of the premium of the Ghanaian national health insurance scheme and the implications for achieving universal coverage. International Journal for Equity in Health 2013; 12(1): 4. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-4 PMid:23294982https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23294982
35 Penson DF, Stoddard ML, Pasta DJ, Lubeck DP, Flanders SC, Litwin MS. The association between socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2001; 54(4): 350358. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00312-7 PMid:11297885https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11297885
36 Williams JC, Blair-Loy M, Berdahl JL. Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues 2013; 69(2): 209234. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012
37 Idris H, Satriawan E, Trisnantoro L. Determinant of health insurance ownership in the informal sector: a panel study from Indonesia family life survey. Advanced Science Letters 2017; 23(4): 35823585. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9186
38 Rahmadani S, Marhania Abadi MY, Marzuki DS, Sudirmanb Fajrin MA. Analysis of independent National Health Insurance ownership of informal workers: study of market traders in Gowa District, Indonesia. Enfermeria Clinica 2020; 30: 295299. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.06.076